AN IN VIVO COMPARISON OF TWO DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN SECONDARY CARIES DETECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SABER HAMISHAKI KAZEM; CHINIFORUSH NASIM; MONZAVI ABBAS; KHAZARAZIFARD MOHAMMAD JAVAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Frontiers in Dentistry Year:2014 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 Page(s): 17-21

Download Full-Text

View:

219

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN IN VIVO COMPARISON OF TWO DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN SECONDARY CARIES DETECTION

Author(s)

SABER HAMISHAKI KAZEM | CHINIFORUSH NASIM | MONZAVI ABBAS | KHAZARAZIFARD MOHAMMAD JAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DIAGNODENT

VISUAL EXAMINATION

SECONDARY CARIES

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the level of agreement between four operators with different levels of experience for two methods of detecting secondary enamel and dentin carious lesions in composite restored teeth.Materials and Methods: Sixty teeth of 40 patients with with secondary carious lesions in the composite resin were selected. The teeth were examined by two methods; visual inspection and a laser fluorescence device (DIAGNO dent pen 2190) by four operators including an undergraduate student, a dentist with 5 years of clinical experience, a general dentist with 12 years of clinical experience and an oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Co-hen's kappa statistic was applied in order to assess the agreement between the diagnoses performed by the four operators with each diagnostic method.Results: The diagnosis performed by different operators achieved an excellent agreement with high ICC.Conclusion: DIAGNODENT can be a useful device for SECONDARY CARIES detection in posterior teeth as an adjunct to VISUAL EXAMINATION.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SABER HAMISHAKI, KAZEM, CHINIFORUSH, NASIM, MONZAVI, ABBAS, & KHAZARAZIFARD, MOHAMMAD JAVAD. (2014). AN IN VIVO COMPARISON OF TWO DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN SECONDARY CARIES DETECTION. FRONTIERS IN DENTISTRY (JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY OF TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), 11(1), 17-21. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/298103/en

Vancouver: Copy

SABER HAMISHAKI KAZEM, CHINIFORUSH NASIM, MONZAVI ABBAS, KHAZARAZIFARD MOHAMMAD JAVAD. AN IN VIVO COMPARISON OF TWO DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN SECONDARY CARIES DETECTION. FRONTIERS IN DENTISTRY (JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY OF TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2014;11(1):17-21. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/298103/en

IEEE: Copy

KAZEM SABER HAMISHAKI, NASIM CHINIFORUSH, ABBAS MONZAVI, and MOHAMMAD JAVAD KHAZARAZIFARD, “AN IN VIVO COMPARISON OF TWO DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN SECONDARY CARIES DETECTION,” FRONTIERS IN DENTISTRY (JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY OF TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/298103/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops