PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN REPAIR

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMIAN F.; AMINIAN ALI; LEBASCHI A.H.; MIRSHARIFI R.; ALIBAKHSHI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Shiraz E-Medical Journal Year:2009 | Volume:10 | Issue:1 Page(s): 20-26

Download Full-Text

View:

392

Download:

147

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN REPAIR

Author(s)

Keywords

PEPTIC ULCER

PERFORATION

REPAIR

LAPAROSCOPY

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing evidence is presenting in favor of laparoscopic REPAIR of perforated PEPTIC ULCER (PPU). A selected group of patients may benefit more with laparoscopic REPAIR than with open surgery. Taking advantage from experiences of other workers, we tried to define this group of patients.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing laparoscopic REPAIR of PPU with open REPAIR. We excluded patients with shock, generalized peritonitis, previous upper abdominal surgery, large ulcer (>10mm), gastric ulcer, and concomitant PEPTIC ULCER complications from both groups. Closure of PERFORATION in both groups was performed by simple suture closure with omental patch.Results: patients underwent laparoscopic REPAIR required less analgesic postoperatively, returned to normal diet earlier, and had a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Laparoscopic REPAIR took more time than open surgery.Conclusion: laparoscopic REPAIR of perforated PEPTIC ULCER is advantageous to open surgery by less postoperative pain, earlier return to normal diet, and earlier discharge from hospital. It may be considered as a safe treatment option for selected patients in routine clinical practice.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMIAN, F., AMINIAN, ALI, LEBASCHI, A.H., MIRSHARIFI, R., & ALIBAKHSHI, A.. (2009). PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN REPAIR. SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL, 10(1), 20-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/299503/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMIAN F., AMINIAN ALI, LEBASCHI A.H., MIRSHARIFI R., ALIBAKHSHI A.. PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN REPAIR. SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2009;10(1):20-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/299503/en

IEEE: Copy

F. KARIMIAN, ALI AMINIAN, A.H. LEBASCHI, R. MIRSHARIFI, and A. ALIBAKHSHI, “PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER, COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN REPAIR,” SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/299503/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops