COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF CAUDAL BLOCK IN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES: TRANS-SACRAL AND TRANS-SACRAL HIATUS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHRIARI A.; HEYDARI M.H.; ROUDBARI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Shiraz E-Medical Journal Year:2008 | Volume:9 | Issue:4 Page(s): 175-181

Download Full-Text

View:

378

Download:

164

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF CAUDAL BLOCK IN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES: TRANS-SACRAL AND TRANS-SACRAL HIATUS

Author(s)

SHAHRIARI A. | HEYDARI M.H. | ROUDBARI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CAUDAL ANESTHESIA

SACRAL HIATUS

TRANS-SACRAL

Abstract

Background: Caudal block offers a good and safe postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients. In a randomized study we have examined the characteristics and mean duration of analgesia after CAUDAL ANESTHESIA performed with two different routes: TRANS-SACRAL and TRANS-SACRAL hiatus.Methods: Forty boys in Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb Hospital of Zahedan undergoing hyspospadias repair were randomly allocated in two groups to receive bupivacaine 1.5mg/kg from sacral route in one group and from SACRAL HIATUS route in the control group. Postoperative pain and sedation scores were assessed for 12 hr after operation.Results: The time of first requiring of additional analgesia did not differ significantly between two groups (365±40 min in sacral group vs 390±35 min in TRANS-SACRAL-hiatus group) (P value=0.17). Side effects were not seen in any patients. Two groups were comparable with regards pain scores and sedation scores at 1 and 7h (P>0.05).Conclusions: We concluded that the TRANS-SACRAL route is an acceptable, safe and easy method for performing caudal block, but total duration of analgesia did not differ with these two methods.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHRIARI, A., HEYDARI, M.H., & ROUDBARI, M.. (2008). COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF CAUDAL BLOCK IN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES: TRANS-SACRAL AND TRANS-SACRAL HIATUS. SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL, 9(4), 175-181. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/299511/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHRIARI A., HEYDARI M.H., ROUDBARI M.. COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF CAUDAL BLOCK IN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES: TRANS-SACRAL AND TRANS-SACRAL HIATUS. SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2008;9(4):175-181. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/299511/en

IEEE: Copy

A. SHAHRIARI, M.H. HEYDARI, and M. ROUDBARI, “COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF CAUDAL BLOCK IN TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES: TRANS-SACRAL AND TRANS-SACRAL HIATUS,” SHIRAZ E MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 175–181, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/299511/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops