A COMPARISON AND DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN SEDENTARY MEN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BOLBALI L.A.; KHOURSHIDI HOSSEINI M.; VALIZADEH I.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Year:2009 | Volume:- | Issue:38 Page(s): 181-195

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

744

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON AND DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN SEDENTARY MEN

Author(s)

BOLBALI L.A. | KHOURSHIDI HOSSEINI M. | VALIZADEH I. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIOQ3

SEDENTARY MENQ2

AGREEMENTQ2

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare three low risk sub-maximal protocols to predict CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) and to develop new predictor equations in SEDENTARY MEN aged between 30 and 60. For this purpose, 150 SEDENTARY MEN (with mean±SD age=45.1±10.15 years, height=172.3±7.62 cm, body weight=70.86±11.27 Kg and BMI=23.86±3.15 Kg/m2 respectively) were selected voluntarily and participated in this research. To predict CVFR values, the subjects performed three low risk sub-maximal exercise tests: the 3-minute Balk and two standard CV fitness tests (A and B tests). The values obtained from 3 selected exercise tests were compared with the 5-minute Balk protocol (criterion protocol). Methodological differences of the protocols were analyzed by Bland-Altman (1986) method. Multiple linear regressions were used to develop new CVFR predictor equations. The results implied that in 95% of the AGREEMENT domain, there was no considerable AGREEMENT between 3 selected protocols and criterion protocol (P<0.05), whereas the 3-minute Balk test with high overestimation (mean±SD difference=7.6±4.16, P<0.05) and the two standard CV fitness tests (A and B tests) with high underestimation (mean±SD difference= -12.59±4.9 and -10.64±4.2 respectively) estimated subjects' relative CV fitness in comparison with the criterion protocol. This study demonstrated that although three selected protocol norms were commonly utilized to estimate CVFR in SEDENTARY MEN, the new equations may present more ideal CVFR estimation in the subgroup. Obviously, it is necessary to conduct further studies.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BOLBALI, L.A., KHOURSHIDI HOSSEINI, M., & VALIZADEH, I.. (2009). A COMPARISON AND DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN SEDENTARY MEN. HARAKAT, -(38), 181-195. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/30179/en

Vancouver: Copy

BOLBALI L.A., KHOURSHIDI HOSSEINI M., VALIZADEH I.. A COMPARISON AND DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN SEDENTARY MEN. HARAKAT[Internet]. 2009;-(38):181-195. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/30179/en

IEEE: Copy

L.A. BOLBALI, M. KHOURSHIDI HOSSEINI, and I. VALIZADEH, “A COMPARISON AND DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS RATIO (CVFR) PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN SEDENTARY MEN,” HARAKAT, vol. -, no. 38, pp. 181–195, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/30179/en

Related Journal Papers