مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

331
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

136
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ROOT CANAL WORKING LENGTH

Pages

  31-35

Abstract

 Introduction Success in endodontic treatment depends on various factors. Among the most important factors, appropriate preparation of the root canal system and kecping periapical region intact as much as possible could be mentioned. These are achieved by determining the penetration depth of the instruments into the canal i.e. the WORKING LENGTH. Several methods are introduced for WORKING LENGTH determination. The most popular techniques in this regard are the use of CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY and electronic APEX LOCATORs. A new type of APEX LOCATOR is the ROOT ZX.The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy rate of ROOT ZX APEX LOCATOR with the CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY.Materials and Methods The WORKING LENGTH of thirty extracted single rooted teeth were determined by means of ROOT ZX and CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY then compared with the actual WORKING LENGTHs measured by the stereomicroscope.Results The results showed there was statistically significant difference between the length determined by the ROOT ZX and stereomicroscope. In addition, the radiographic and stereomicroscopic WORKING LENGTHs had statistically significant differences as well. There was also significant difference between the lengths measured by the ROOT ZX and radiography.Conclusion It is recommended to use the ROOT ZX and radiography both together to reach the most accurate WORKING LENGTH.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORADI, SAEID, JAVIDI, M., RASHED, R., & RAZIEE, L.. (2006). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ROOT CANAL WORKING LENGTH. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), 1(1), 31-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/302578/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORADI SAEID, JAVIDI M., RASHED R., RAZIEE L.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ROOT CANAL WORKING LENGTH. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ)[Internet]. 2006;1(1):31-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/302578/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SAEID MORADI, M. JAVIDI, R. RASHED, and L. RAZIEE, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ROOT CANAL WORKING LENGTH,” IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/302578/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button