مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

302
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

398
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOME BETWEEN ULTRASOUND- GUIDED TUBAL RECANALIZATION AND OFFICE-BASED MICROHYSTEROSCOPIC OSTIAL DILATATION IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL BLOCKED TUBES

Pages

  497-505

Abstract

 Background: The current research to the best of my knowledge is the first to compare the pregnancy outcome between ultrasound-guided tubal recanalization (UGTR) using a special fallopian tubal catheter, and office-based micrhysteroscopic ostial dilatation (MHOD) using the same tubal catherter in infertile women with previously diagnosed bilateral proximal tubal obstruction (PTO).Materials and Methods: This prospective study reported the pregnancy outcomes for 200 women in private infertility care center in Arafa hospital in Fayoum and in El Minya University Hospital in the period between January 2010 and October 2013 treated as outpatients for their bilateral PTO after the routine hysterosalpingography (HSG). A Cook’s catheter, special fallopian tubal catheter, were used to recanalize the blocked tubes in 100 women (group A) under UGTR, and the same Cook’s tubal catheter was used through 2mm microhysteroscope to cannulate both ostia using MHOD in another 100 women (group B). Pregnancy outcome was determined after the procedures for a 12-month period follow-up.Results: The number of the recanalization of PTO was not significantly different between two groups. As of the 200 blocked FALLOPIAN TUBEs in group A, 140 tubes (70%) were successfully recanalized by passing the ultrasound-guided special cannula, while 150 tubes (75%) were successfully recanalized in group B, using the same tubal catheter through a 2mm microhysteroscope. The cumulative pregnancy rate after the two procedures was not statistically different between two groups. It was 25.9% in group A, while it was 26.3% in group B, after a 12-month period follow-up.Conclusion: UGTR is highly recommended as the first step to manage infertile women due to PTO, as it is easier procedure; however, there is possible to obtain nearly similar results after MHOD.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOSTAFA SEYAM, EMADULDIN, MOHAMED HASSAN, MOMEN, MOHAMED SAYED GAD, MOHAMED TAWFEEK, MAHMOUD, HAZEM SALAH, & IBRAHIM, MOSTAFA GAMAL. (2016). COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOME BETWEEN ULTRASOUND- GUIDED TUBAL RECANALIZATION AND OFFICE-BASED MICROHYSTEROSCOPIC OSTIAL DILATATION IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL BLOCKED TUBES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 9(4), 497-505. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/305843/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOSTAFA SEYAM EMADULDIN, MOHAMED HASSAN MOMEN, MOHAMED SAYED GAD MOHAMED TAWFEEK, MAHMOUD HAZEM SALAH, IBRAHIM MOSTAFA GAMAL. COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOME BETWEEN ULTRASOUND- GUIDED TUBAL RECANALIZATION AND OFFICE-BASED MICROHYSTEROSCOPIC OSTIAL DILATATION IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL BLOCKED TUBES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND STERILITY[Internet]. 2016;9(4):497-505. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/305843/en

    IEEE: Copy

    EMADULDIN MOSTAFA SEYAM, MOMEN MOHAMED HASSAN, MOHAMED TAWFEEK MOHAMED SAYED GAD, HAZEM SALAH MAHMOUD, and MOSTAFA GAMAL IBRAHIM, “COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY OUTCOME BETWEEN ULTRASOUND- GUIDED TUBAL RECANALIZATION AND OFFICE-BASED MICROHYSTEROSCOPIC OSTIAL DILATATION IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL BLOCKED TUBES,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND STERILITY, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 497–505, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/305843/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button