مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

274
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

142
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE “IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES”, 2007-2010

Pages

  77-82

Abstract

 Objective: This study has been done in order to evaluate the papers published in the "Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences" from 2007 to 2010.Methods: A questionnaire was developed according to the design, evidence level, and recommendations to write scientific papers. Validity was achieved by consulting experts. Reliability was tested by re-evaluation of 7 randomly selected papers, one month after the first evaluation by Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.8).Different parts of the paper, including title, abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, and references, were evaluated by a total of 47 questions. Each required item was judged as: appropriate, partially appropriate, not appropriate, and not applicable. SPSS software was used for descriptive analysis.Results: From spring 2007 to summer 2010, 7 issues with 72 papers were published. The most frequent problem in the title was that one could not understand the design of the research by reading it. In the abstract part, in 90% of papers, time and setting of research were not mentioned. Statistical test was not mentioned in 70%, and reliability of the questionnaires was not mentioned in 70% of papers. The discussion part was the hardest part to judge and had few inappropriate issues, such as unnecessary repetition of introduction and/or results; in 20% of papers the conclusion was not appropriate based on the research design.Conclusions: The evaluated papers had strong points, yet more effort is needed for them to approach excellence.

Cites

References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KOSARYAN, MEHRNOOSH, & RABIEI, KHADIJEH. (2013). THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE “IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES”, 2007-2010. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (IJPBS), 7(2), 77-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/312019/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KOSARYAN MEHRNOOSH, RABIEI KHADIJEH. THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE “IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES”, 2007-2010. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (IJPBS)[Internet]. 2013;7(2):77-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/312019/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MEHRNOOSH KOSARYAN, and KHADIJEH RABIEI, “THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAPERS PUBLISHED IN THE “IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES”, 2007-2010,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (IJPBS), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 77–82, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/312019/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button