COMPARISON OF THE ASSEOINTEYRATION BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES, IN POOR BONE GUOLITY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAMJOUYNIK SHAHRAM; BELADIYAN HADI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Daneshvar Medicine: Basic and Clinical Research Journal Year:2001 | Volume:8 | Issue:32 Page(s): 29-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

803

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE ASSEOINTEYRATION BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES, IN POOR BONE GUOLITY

Author(s)

NAMJOUYNIK SHAHRAM | BELADIYAN HADI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IMPLANTQ2

PRIALIT-2Q4

IMZQ4

NOBEL-BIOCAREQ4

BONEQ4

HISTOMORPHOMETRYQ3

RABBITQ4

POOR QUALITY BONEQ3

Abstract

This paper reports histologic and histomorphometric results concerning BONE healing around 3-root form IMPLANTs that were placed in the three RABBITs tibias. The RABBIT tibia was as a study model of poor quality BONE. The IMPLANTs were one NOBEL-BIOCARE (screw type), one IMZ- Twin Plus (cylindric titanium plasma spray) and one PRIALIT-2 hydroxylapatite coated. The RABBITs were sacrificed after 6 months. Osseous healing around the IMPLANTs did not show a great deal of variability.Respectively, the NOBEL-BIOCARE showed the greatest amount of BONE apposition with the mean total cortical BONE (99%), then Prialit 2 (HA coated) (95.5%) and IMZ-Twinplus (titanium plalma spray) (86%). In the cancellous region, respectively, the IMZ- Twinplus showed the greatest amount of BONE apposition with the mean of (68.5%), then Prialit 2 (HA coated) (57%) and NOBEL-BIOCARE (48%). This primary research suggests that osseous healing around IMPLANTs in the poor quality BONE do not differ with different titanium surface roughness and hydroxyapatite coating.

Cites

پیوند سینوس: مقایسه ماده قابل جذب بیوگلاس با محافظت غشای قابل جذب کلاژن و بدون آن

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NAMJOUYNIK, SHAHRAM, & BELADIYAN, HADI. (2001). COMPARISON OF THE ASSEOINTEYRATION BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES, IN POOR BONE GUOLITY. DANESHVAR MEDICINE, 8(32), 29-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/31236/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAMJOUYNIK SHAHRAM, BELADIYAN HADI. COMPARISON OF THE ASSEOINTEYRATION BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES, IN POOR BONE GUOLITY. DANESHVAR MEDICINE[Internet]. 2001;8(32):29-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/31236/en

IEEE: Copy

SHAHRAM NAMJOUYNIK, and HADI BELADIYAN, “COMPARISON OF THE ASSEOINTEYRATION BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES, IN POOR BONE GUOLITY,” DANESHVAR MEDICINE, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. 29–34, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/31236/en

Related Journal Papers