مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

285
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

199
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: PROPOFOL + KETAMINE VERSUS PROPOFOL + ETOMIDATE

Pages

  51-54

Abstract

 Introduction: Various methods have been recommended to prevent hemodynamic instability caused by propofol induction. Current study evaluates hemodynamic effects of ketamine and propofol in comparison to etomidate and propofol during anesthesia induction.Methods: Sixty-two patients over 50 years old undergoing elective surgeries were randomly assigned to ketamine + propofol (ketofol) (n=30) and etomidate + propofol (etofol) (n=32) groups. Patients in ketofol group were induced with ketamine 0.75 mg/ kg and propofol 1 mg/kg. In etofol group, induction was performed with etomidate 0.2 mg/kg and propofol 1 mg/kg. Hemodynamic states before and after induction, first, third and sixth minutes after intubation were measured and compared between groups.Results: There was no difference between groups in systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and blood oxygen saturation (SaO2). There was significant decrease in SAP, DAP and MAP after induction and 6 minutes after intubation and in HR after induction than values before induction. There was significant increase in SaO2 in all evaluated periods than before induction in etofol group; however, the difference in ketofol group was not significant.Conclusion: Both methods of induction -ketamine + propofol and etomidate + propofolare effective in maintaining hemodynamic stability and preventing hemodynamic changes due to propofol administration.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOSSEINZADEH, HAMZEH, EYDI, MAHMOOD, GOLZARI, SAMAD E.J., & VASEBI, MAHMOOD. (2013). HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: PROPOFOL + KETAMINE VERSUS PROPOFOL + ETOMIDATE. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, 5(2), 51-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/314911/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOSSEINZADEH HAMZEH, EYDI MAHMOOD, GOLZARI SAMAD E.J., VASEBI MAHMOOD. HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: PROPOFOL + KETAMINE VERSUS PROPOFOL + ETOMIDATE. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH[Internet]. 2013;5(2):51-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/314911/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HAMZEH HOSSEINZADEH, MAHMOOD EYDI, SAMAD E.J. GOLZARI, and MAHMOOD VASEBI, “HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: PROPOFOL + KETAMINE VERSUS PROPOFOL + ETOMIDATE,” JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–54, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/314911/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button