مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

318
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

99
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MIDAZOLAM VERSUS NEOSTIGMINEADDING TO LIDOCAINE IN POST OPERATION PAIN IN COLPORRHAPHY SURGERY IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA

Pages

  79-83

Abstract

 Objective: To compare the effect of intrathecal midazolam versus neostigmine added to lidocaine on the duration of sensory block and the duration of postoperative pain relief in women undergoing colporaphy in SPINAL ANESTHESIA.Materials and methods: In this double blind clinical trial we evaluated 60women (ASA) I, II that were candidate to elective colporaphy. The patients were randomly divided in three groups, first group (midazolam group) received hyperbaric lidocaine and 1mg midazolam (0.5cc), second group ( neostigmine group) received hyperbaric lidocaine and 50mg midazolam (0.5cc) and third group were considered as control and received hyperbaric lidocaine plus normal saline (0.5cc).VAS pain score 4, 12 and 24 hours after surgery and duration of ANALGESIA in tree groups were compared.Results: The duration of sensory block in the midazolam group was 98.4±18.2minuts, 74.5±32.6 in neostigmine and 64.5±9.9 in control group and difference between three groups was significant (p=0.001). Postoperative pain scores in midazolam group was 1.5±1.3, in neostigmine group was 2.4±1.6 and in control group was 3.5±2.7 and difference between three groups was significant (P=0.009).Conclusion: Midazolam & neostigmine added to lidocaine 5% prolonged postoperative ANALGESIA in COLPORRHAPHY surgery in SPINAL ANESTHESIA but midazolam was more effective than neostigmine.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KAMALI, ALIREZA, SHOKRPOUR, MARYAM, VATANPOUR, KHATEREH, & GOLESTANI ERAGHI, MAJID. (2012). MIDAZOLAM VERSUS NEOSTIGMINEADDING TO LIDOCAINE IN POST OPERATION PAIN IN COLPORRHAPHY SURGERY IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 6(2), 79-83. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/320842/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KAMALI ALIREZA, SHOKRPOUR MARYAM, VATANPOUR KHATEREH, GOLESTANI ERAGHI MAJID. MIDAZOLAM VERSUS NEOSTIGMINEADDING TO LIDOCAINE IN POST OPERATION PAIN IN COLPORRHAPHY SURGERY IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH[Internet]. 2012;6(2):79-83. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/320842/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA KAMALI, MARYAM SHOKRPOUR, KHATEREH VATANPOUR, and MAJID GOLESTANI ERAGHI, “MIDAZOLAM VERSUS NEOSTIGMINEADDING TO LIDOCAINE IN POST OPERATION PAIN IN COLPORRHAPHY SURGERY IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA,” JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79–83, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/320842/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button