مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

232
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

88
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN MINIMAL STIMULATION PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONAL GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS

Pages

  35-41

Abstract

 Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes achieved by IN VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF) between minimal stimulation and CONVENTIONAL ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLs in POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS (PORs).Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 77 PORs undergoing IVF were selected and divided into two groups. First group was the minimal stimulation group (n=42) receiving 100 mg/day clomiphene citrate on day 2of the cycle for 5 day that was followed by150IU/day human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) on day 5 of the cycle. Second group was the conventional group (n=35) receiving at least 300 IU/daygonadotropin on day 2 of the cycle. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol was applied for both groups according to flexible protocol. Number of retrieved oocytes and chemical pregnancy rate were the main outcomes.Results: There was no difference in number ofretrieved oocyte and pregnancy rate (2.79 ± 1.96 vs.2.20 ± 1.71 and 5.6% vs.4.1%; p>0.05) between both groups. The gonadotropin dose used in the minimal stimulation group was lower than conventional group (1046 ± 596 vs.2806 ± 583).Conclusion: MINIMAL STIMULATION PROTOCOL with lower gonadotropin used is likely to be considered as a patient- friendly and cost-effective substitute for PORs.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    PILEHVARI, SHAMIM, SHAHROKH TEHRANINEJAD, ENSIEH, HOSSEIN RASHIDI, BATOOL, KEIKHAH, FATEMEH, HAGHOLLAHI, FEDYEH, & AZIMI NEKOO, ELHAM. (2016). COMPARISON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN MINIMAL STIMULATION PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONAL GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 10(1), 35-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/320922/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PILEHVARI SHAMIM, SHAHROKH TEHRANINEJAD ENSIEH, HOSSEIN RASHIDI BATOOL, KEIKHAH FATEMEH, HAGHOLLAHI FEDYEH, AZIMI NEKOO ELHAM. COMPARISON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN MINIMAL STIMULATION PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONAL GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH[Internet]. 2016;10(1):35-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/320922/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHAMIM PILEHVARI, ENSIEH SHAHROKH TEHRANINEJAD, BATOOL HOSSEIN RASHIDI, FATEMEH KEIKHAH, FEDYEH HAGHOLLAHI, and ELHAM AZIMI NEKOO, “COMPARISON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN MINIMAL STIMULATION PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONAL GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS,” JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/320922/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button