TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A COMPARISON WITH TUBELESS AND STANDARD METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESLAHI ALI; IRANI DARIUSH; HOSSEINI MOHAMMAD MEHDI; SAFARPOUR ALI REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Nephro-Urology Monthly Year:2017 | Volume:9 | Issue:4 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

540

Download:

223

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A COMPARISON WITH TUBELESS AND STANDARD METHODS

Author(s)

ESLAHI ALI | IRANI DARIUSH | HOSSEINI MOHAMMAD MEHDI | SAFARPOUR ALI REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NEPHROLITHIASIS

PERCUTANEOUS

TUBELESS

OUTCOME

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to compare TUBELESS, totally TUBELESS, and standard PERCUTANEOUS nephrolithotomy (PNL) in a tertiary center with selected patient population.Methods: Between September 2013 and March 2015, PERCUTANEOUS nephrolithotomy was performed on 216 patients in our center.Patients without massive bleeding, calyceal perforation, and residual fragments smaller than 4mmwere enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups. In the first group (n=68), we placed nephrostomy and kept ureteral catheter for 24 hours (the standard group). In second the group (n=69), no nephrostomy was inserted and ureteral catheter was removed in the operation room (the totally TUBELESS group) and in the third group (n=79), no nephrostomy catheter was placed but antegrade DJ stent was inserted intraoperatively (the TUBELESS group). Three groups were compared with respect to age, analgesic requirement, BMI, length of stay, pain, and stone size.Results: No significant differences were found in the mean stone size, operation time, transfusion rates, and hemoglobin level change between the groups. However, hospitalization time, the amount of narcotic usage, and pain were significantly lower in the second group compared to the other groups (P<0.05).Conclusions: In patients with no major intraoperative bleeding and calyceal perforation, the totally TUBELESS approach is safe with decreased pain, analgesia requirement, and hospital stay.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESLAHI, ALI, IRANI, DARIUSH, HOSSEINI, MOHAMMAD MEHDI, & SAFARPOUR, ALI REZA. (2017). TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A COMPARISON WITH TUBELESS AND STANDARD METHODS. THE JOURNAL OF NEPHRO-UROLOGY MONTHLY, 9(4), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/323810/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESLAHI ALI, IRANI DARIUSH, HOSSEINI MOHAMMAD MEHDI, SAFARPOUR ALI REZA. TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A COMPARISON WITH TUBELESS AND STANDARD METHODS. THE JOURNAL OF NEPHRO-UROLOGY MONTHLY[Internet]. 2017;9(4):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/323810/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI ESLAHI, DARIUSH IRANI, MOHAMMAD MEHDI HOSSEINI, and ALI REZA SAFARPOUR, “TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A COMPARISON WITH TUBELESS AND STANDARD METHODS,” THE JOURNAL OF NEPHRO-UROLOGY MONTHLY, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/323810/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops