COMPARISON OF MINIMAL EXCISION AND DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE METHODS IN PILONIDAL SINUS SURGERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOUSAVI NAEINI S.M.; MOUSAVI FARID; TOULIAT KASHANI S.M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL Year:2009 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 Page(s): 53-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

871

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MINIMAL EXCISION AND DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE METHODS IN PILONIDAL SINUS SURGERY

Author(s)

MOUSAVI NAEINI S.M. | MOUSAVI FARID | TOULIAT KASHANI S.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PILONIDAL DISEASESQ3

MINIMAL EXCISIONQ3

DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSUREQ3

Abstract

Aims. Pilonidal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition usually occurring in the sacrococcygeal region. The aim of this study was to compare the results of MINIMAL EXCISION with DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE procedure in pilonidal sinus.Materials & Methods. A total of 160 male patients (mean age of 22.64 years) divided in two groups. 80 patients undergone MINIMAL EXCISION (open) and 80 patients undergone DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE (close).Results. Duration of surgery was 4.53 in open group and 16.01 in close group (p=0.0001). Average hospital stay for two groups was 1.16 days. Average time of return to work was 14.51 days in open group and 18/38 days in close group (p=0.05). Average time of wound healing was 26.94 days in open group and 13.63 days in close group (p=0.0001). Average tensity of pain was 4.21 in open group and 4.51 in closed group (p=0.3). Recurrence rate occurred in 7.5% of patients in two groups (p=0.41).Conclusion. There is no significant difference between two groups in pain, recurrence rate, hospital stay and return to work. But, there are significant differences in duration of surgery, postoperative discharge, bleeding and healing time between two groups. DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE is superior procedure for surgical treatment of PILONIDAL DISEASES.

Cites

No record.

References

PRESENTATION OF MULTILAYER CLOSURE IN TREATMENT OF SACRAL PILONIDAL DISEASE

Cite

APA: Copy

MOUSAVI NAEINI, S.M., MOUSAVI, FARID, & TOULIAT KASHANI, S.M.. (2009). COMPARISON OF MINIMAL EXCISION AND DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE METHODS IN PILONIDAL SINUS SURGERY. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, 14(1), 53-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/32811/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOUSAVI NAEINI S.M., MOUSAVI FARID, TOULIAT KASHANI S.M.. COMPARISON OF MINIMAL EXCISION AND DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE METHODS IN PILONIDAL SINUS SURGERY. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2009;14(1):53-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/32811/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. MOUSAVI NAEINI, FARID MOUSAVI, and S.M. TOULIAT KASHANI, “COMPARISON OF MINIMAL EXCISION AND DEEP LAYER PRIMARY CLOSURE METHODS IN PILONIDAL SINUS SURGERY,” KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53–56, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/32811/en

Related Journal Papers