Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

288
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

105
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFICACY OF EPIDURAL INJECTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR CENTRAL SPINAL STENOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Pages

  1-15

Abstract

 Context: Lumbar central spinal stenosis is common and often results in chronic persistent PAIN and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After the failure of conservative treatment, either surgical or nonsurgical modalities such as epidural INJECTIONS are contemplated in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis.Evidence Acquisition: Recent randomized trials, systematic reviews and guidelines have reached varying conclusions about the efficacy of epidural INJECTIONS in the management of central lumbar spinal stenosis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of all three anatomical epidural injection approaches (caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal) in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis. A systematic review was performed on randomized trials published from 1966 to July 2014 of all types of epidural INJECTIONS used in the management of lumbar central spinal stenosis. Methodological quality assessment and grading of the evidence was performed.Results: The evidence in managing lumbar spinal stenosis is Level II for long-term improvement for caudal and lumbar interlaminar epidural INJECTIONS. For transforaminal epidural INJECTIONS, the evidence is Level III for short-term improvement only. The interlaminar approach appears to be superior to the caudal approach and the caudal approach appears to be superior to the transforaminal one.Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that epidural INJECTIONS with LOCAL ANESTHETIC alone or with LOCAL ANESTHETIC with steroids offer short- and long-term relief of low back and lower extremity PAIN for patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis. However, the evidence is Level II for the long-term efficacy of caudal and interlaminar epidural INJECTIONS, whereas it is Level III for short-term improvement only with transforaminal epidural INJECTIONS.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MANCHIKANTI, LAXMAIAH, KAYE, ALAN DAVID, MANCHIKANTI, KAVITA, BOSWELL, MARK, PAMPATI, VIDYASAGAR, & HIRSCH, JOSHUA. (2015). EFFICACY OF EPIDURAL INJECTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR CENTRAL SPINAL STENOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE, 5(1), 1-15. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/328537/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MANCHIKANTI LAXMAIAH, KAYE ALAN DAVID, MANCHIKANTI KAVITA, BOSWELL MARK, PAMPATI VIDYASAGAR, HIRSCH JOSHUA. EFFICACY OF EPIDURAL INJECTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR CENTRAL SPINAL STENOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2015;5(1):1-15. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/328537/en

    IEEE: Copy

    LAXMAIAH MANCHIKANTI, ALAN DAVID KAYE, KAVITA MANCHIKANTI, MARK BOSWELL, VIDYASAGAR PAMPATI, and JOSHUA HIRSCH, “EFFICACY OF EPIDURAL INJECTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR CENTRAL SPINAL STENOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW,” ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/328537/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top