مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

456
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

142
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FEEDBACK IS GOOD OR BAD? MEDICAL RESIDENTS’ POINTS OF VIEW ON FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL EDUCATION

Pages

  51-54

Abstract

 Introduction: FEEDBACK is very important in education and can help quality in the training process and orient the trainees in clinical contexts. This study aimed to assess the residents’ points of view about FEEDBACK in clinical education at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.Methods: The sample of this study included 170 MEDICAL RESIDENTS attending medical workshops in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The residents filled a valid and reliable questionnaire containing 21 items on their perceptions of the FEEDBACK they got throughout the workshops. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 14.Results: The study revealed that residents, generally, have a positive perception of FEEDBACK in their training. The highest score belonged to the items such as "FEEDBACK was applicable to future work", "FEEDBACK corrected my behavior", "FEEDBACK worked as a motivation for education" and "FEEDBACK was specific in one subject". Residents who had a negative FEEDBACK experience also increased their efforts to learn. The Surgery residents acquired the highest scores while radiology residents got the lowest. The difference between these groups was statistically significant (P=0.000).Conclusion: The highest mean score belonged to internal medicine residents. This shows that residents believe that obstetrics & gynecology ward is a ward in which the formative assessment is much more powerful in comparison to the other three major wards. The surgery ward received the lowest score for formative assessment and this shows that the FEEDBACK in surgery ward is very low.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BAZRAFKAN, LEILA, GHASSEMI, GHOLAM HOSSAIN, & NABEIEI, PARISA. (2013). FEEDBACK IS GOOD OR BAD? MEDICAL RESIDENTS’ POINTS OF VIEW ON FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL EDUCATION. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONALISM, 1(2), 51-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/334827/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BAZRAFKAN LEILA, GHASSEMI GHOLAM HOSSAIN, NABEIEI PARISA. FEEDBACK IS GOOD OR BAD? MEDICAL RESIDENTS’ POINTS OF VIEW ON FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL EDUCATION. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONALISM[Internet]. 2013;1(2):51-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/334827/en

    IEEE: Copy

    LEILA BAZRAFKAN, GHOLAM HOSSAIN GHASSEMI, and PARISA NABEIEI, “FEEDBACK IS GOOD OR BAD? MEDICAL RESIDENTS’ POINTS OF VIEW ON FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL EDUCATION,” JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONALISM, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–54, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/334827/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button