مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

308
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

142
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?

Pages

  27-33

Abstract

 Objective: To compare the Injury severity scales as predictors of Mortality in trauma patients to search for the best scale. Methods: In a prospective cohort study and systematical random sampling conducted from March to September 2017, trauma patients over the age of 13 years were enrolled. The investigated variables were age, gender, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, injured body region, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury severity score/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Injury severity score (ISS), Revised trauma score (RTS), Injury severity score/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Injury severity score/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Trauma Injury severity score/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Injury severity score (TRISS) and the outcome. Results: Totally, 1410 trauma patients were followed up, out of which 68. 5% were male. The participants’ mean age was 43. 5± 20. 88 years. After adjusting the confounding effects, age over 60 years (OR=7. 38, CI [3. 91-13. 93]), GCS<8 (OR=6. 5, CI [2. 38-18. 16]), RTS<7. 6 (OR=6. 04, CI [2-13. 7]), and TRISS<0. 9 (OR=3. 09, CI [1. 39-6. 88]) were determined as the most significant predictor variables for in-hospital Mortality. The results of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that TRISS had the highest area under the curve in comparison to other tests that were evaluated. Furthermore, TRISS had the highest sensitivity and specificity for scores higher than 96. 15. By contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of GCS decreased for scores higher than 5. 5. Conclusion: Our results showed that TRISS, RTS, GCS, and ISS were all very effective approaches for evaluating prognosis, Mortality and probable complications in trauma patients; thus, these systems of Injury evaluation and scoring are recommended to facilitate treatment. TRISS, RTS, and ISS had almost the same sensitivity that was higher than GCS, but GCS had the most specificity. Finally, TRISS was selected as the most efficient scale for predicting Mortality.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    YADOLLAHI, MAHNAZ, KASHKOOE, ALI, Rezaiee, Reza, JAMALI, KAZEM, & NIAKAN, MOHAMMAD HADI. (2020). A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?. BULLETIN OF EMERGENCY AND TRAUMA BEAT, 8(1), 27-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/335151/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    YADOLLAHI MAHNAZ, KASHKOOE ALI, Rezaiee Reza, JAMALI KAZEM, NIAKAN MOHAMMAD HADI. A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?. BULLETIN OF EMERGENCY AND TRAUMA BEAT[Internet]. 2020;8(1):27-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/335151/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHNAZ YADOLLAHI, ALI KASHKOOE, Reza Rezaiee, KAZEM JAMALI, and MOHAMMAD HADI NIAKAN, “A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?,” BULLETIN OF EMERGENCY AND TRAUMA BEAT, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/335151/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button