The “ Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Parker Lisa; Bero Lisa; Gillies Donna; Raven Melissa; Grundy Quinn

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2019 | Volume:8 | Issue:3 Page(s): 168-176

Download Full-Text

View:

261

Download:

117

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The “ Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena

Author(s)

Keywords

Mobile Applications

mhealth

Regulation

Policy Analysis

Mental Health

Australia

Abstract

Background: Health apps are a booming, yet under-regulated market, with potential consumer harms in privacy and health safety. Regulation of the health app market tends to be siloed, with no single sector holding comprehensive oversight. We sought to explore this phenomenon by critically analysing how the problem of health app Regulation is being presented and addressed in the policy arena. Methods: We conducted a critical, qualitative case study of Regulation of the Australian Mental Health app market. We purposively sampled influential policies from government, industry and non-profit organisations that provided oversight of app development, distribution or selection for use. We used Bacchi’ s critical, theoretical approach to Policy Analysis, analysing policy solutions in relation to the ways the underlying problem was presented and discussed. We analysed the ways that policies characterised key stakeholder groups and the rationale policy authors provided for various mechanisms of health app oversight. Results: We identified and analysed 29 policies from Australia and beyond, spanning 5 sectors: medical device, privacy, advertising, finance, and digital content. Policy authors predominantly framed the problem as potential loss of commercial reputations and profits, rather than consumer protection. Policy solutions assigned main responsibility for app oversight to the public, with a heavy onus on consumers to select safe and high-quality apps. Commercial actors, including powerful app distributors and commercial third parties were rarely subjects of policy initiatives, despite having considerable power to affect app user outcomes. Conclusion: A stronger regulatory focus on app distributors and commercial partners may improve consumer privacy and safety. Policy-makers in different sectors should work together to develop an overarching regulatory framework for health apps, with a focus on consumer protection.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Parker, Lisa, Bero, Lisa, Gillies, Donna, Raven, Melissa, & Grundy, Quinn. (2019). The “ Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 8(3), 168-176. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338714/en

Vancouver: Copy

Parker Lisa, Bero Lisa, Gillies Donna, Raven Melissa, Grundy Quinn. The “ Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2019;8(3):168-176. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338714/en

IEEE: Copy

Lisa Parker, Lisa Bero, Donna Gillies, Melissa Raven, and Quinn Grundy, “The “ Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 168–176, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338714/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops