مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

683
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF RAPID UREASE TEST COMPARED WITH POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Pages

  394-400

Abstract

 Background: Current diagnostic methods for detecting HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection include RAPID UREASE TEST (RUT), urea breath test (UBT), histology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RUT is the most commonly method to diagnoseHELICOBACTER PYLORI infection because of its simple, rapid and accurate characters. The aim of this study is evaluation of RAPID UREASE TEST compared with PCR for diagnosis of HELICOBACTER PYLORI.Material and Methods: In this study 94 patients with dyspeptic symptoms attending the endoscopy suite of gastroenterology section of the Firouzgar University Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were enrolled. Patient’s antrum BIOPSY specimens were collected at endoscopy for the RAPID UREASE TEST and PCR. Data was recorded on a data sheet and analyzed using SPSS version 19.0. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RUT was compared against PCR. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection was PCR.Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RUT respectively were 97.2%, 89.2%, 81.4% and 98%.Conclusion: RUT has high sensitivity and specificity for detection of HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    PAKBAZ, Z., SHIRAZI, M.H., POURMAND, M.R., AZHDARKOSH, H., VAISE MALEKSHAHI, Z., AFSHAR, D., HAJIKHANI, S., & MARDANI, N.. (2014). EVALUATION OF RAPID UREASE TEST COMPARED WITH POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. IRANIAN SOUTH MEDICAL JOURNAL (ISMJ), 16(6), 394-400. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/33886/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PAKBAZ Z., SHIRAZI M.H., POURMAND M.R., AZHDARKOSH H., VAISE MALEKSHAHI Z., AFSHAR D., HAJIKHANI S., MARDANI N.. EVALUATION OF RAPID UREASE TEST COMPARED WITH POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. IRANIAN SOUTH MEDICAL JOURNAL (ISMJ)[Internet]. 2014;16(6):394-400. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/33886/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. PAKBAZ, M.H. SHIRAZI, M.R. POURMAND, H. AZHDARKOSH, Z. VAISE MALEKSHAHI, D. AFSHAR, S. HAJIKHANI, and N. MARDANI, “EVALUATION OF RAPID UREASE TEST COMPARED WITH POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI,” IRANIAN SOUTH MEDICAL JOURNAL (ISMJ), vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 394–400, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/33886/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top