مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

195
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

81
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Midazolam Using Jetinjector in Pediatric Sedation; a Randomized Clinical Trial

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Introduction: The quality of interventions in children is largely dependent on their control. Hence, this study compared the sedative effects of Subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) Midazolam in pediatric sedation induction. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on children aged 1-6 years presenting to emergency departments of Shahid Sadoughi and Shahid Rahnemoon Hospitals, Yazd, Iran. Participants were randomly assigned to IV or SC Midazolam using a jet injector and success rate, degree of sedation, and satisfaction of parents and physician were compared between groups. Results: 60 cases with the mean age of 3. 15§ 1. 43 (1-6) years were randomly assigned to the SC (30 cases) or IV (30 cases) groups (56. 7%female). SC and IV groups were similar regarding the mean age (p = 0. 165) and sex (p = 0. 121). Depth of sedation (p=0. 900), control of child (p=0. 711), in-charge physician’ s satisfaction (p=0. 467), successful sedation and need for rescue dose (p=0. 519) were not different between groups. IV Midazolamgroup had a significantly shorter recovery time (about 10 minutes; p=0. 040) and SC Midazolam group had a significantly higher level of parent satisfaction (p=0. 001). Conclusion: The findings indicate no significant difference in depth of sedation, control of child, in-charge physician’ s satisfaction, successful sedation (reaching stage 1 of sedation or higher), and need for rescue dose of SC and IV Midazolam. Parents’ satisfaction was significantly greater with SC administration and IV injection had shorter recovery time.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    HAJIMAGHSOUDI, MAJID, Bagherabadi, Mehdi, ZAREPUR, EHSAN, & Ahmadi Hanzaei, Vahid. (2018). Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Midazolam Using Jetinjector in Pediatric Sedation; a Randomized Clinical Trial. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY), 6(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/339653/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HAJIMAGHSOUDI MAJID, Bagherabadi Mehdi, ZAREPUR EHSAN, Ahmadi Hanzaei Vahid. Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Midazolam Using Jetinjector in Pediatric Sedation; a Randomized Clinical Trial. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY)[Internet]. 2018;6(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/339653/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAJID HAJIMAGHSOUDI, Mehdi Bagherabadi, EHSAN ZAREPUR, and Vahid Ahmadi Hanzaei, “Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Midazolam Using Jetinjector in Pediatric Sedation; a Randomized Clinical Trial,” ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/339653/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button