مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

294
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

102
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SURGEON'S ERRORS IN THE MANAGMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL CANCER

Pages

  165-169

Abstract

 Background&aim: Generally, in patients with CERVICAL CANCER, careful preliminary evaluation is necessary for avoiding improper surgical procedures and making effective clinical decisions for treatment. The aim of this study was to determine surgeon errors, which necessitate a combination of surgery and radiotherapy for CERVICAL CANCER patients.Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of all CERVICAL CANCER patients, undergoing hysterectomy at tumor clinics of Ghaem and Omid Hospitals, were collected from 1988 to 2008. In total, the medical records of 93 subjects with postoperative radiotherapy were examined. All records were assessed in terms of surgeons’ errors, patients’ follow-up after radiotherapy, rate of disease recurrence, and mortality rate. In addition, survival factors were recordedandassessed, and cumulative 3- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates as well as overall survival (OS) rate were determined by Kaplan–Meiertest.Results: The overall rate of surgeons’ errors was 41%. The most common SURGICAL ERROR was improper surgical care due to surgeon’s lack of knowledge about the CERVICAL CANCER treatment. The 3-year DFS rates were 86% and 64% in cases without surgeon’s error and those affected by surgeon's error, respectively. In addition, the 5-year DFS rate was 53% in the non-affected group and 47% in cases affected by surgeon's error (P=0.05).Conclusion: Pre-treatment evaluation as well as proper treatment is necessary for the prevention of adverse effects, caused by inappropriate surgical interventions. It is suggested that more time and attention be allocated to the improvement of surgical outcomes.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    YOUSEFI, ZOHREH, HOMAEE SHANDIZ, FATEMEH, TALEBIAN, MARZIEH, ESMAILY, HABIBOLLAH, & HASANZADEH, MALIHEH. (2014). SURGEON'S ERRORS IN THE MANAGMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL CANCER. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2(3), 165-169. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/341459/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    YOUSEFI ZOHREH, HOMAEE SHANDIZ FATEMEH, TALEBIAN MARZIEH, ESMAILY HABIBOLLAH, HASANZADEH MALIHEH. SURGEON'S ERRORS IN THE MANAGMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL CANCER. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH[Internet]. 2014;2(3):165-169. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/341459/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ZOHREH YOUSEFI, FATEMEH HOMAEE SHANDIZ, MARZIEH TALEBIAN, HABIBOLLAH ESMAILY, and MALIHEH HASANZADEH, “SURGEON'S ERRORS IN THE MANAGMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL CANCER,” JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 165–169, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/341459/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button