Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RABIEI N.; AHMADI BADI S.; Ettehad Marvasti f.; NEJAD SATTARI T.; VAZIRI F.; SIADAT S.D.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: VACCINE RESEARCH Year:2018 | Volume:5 | Issue:1 Page(s): 27-31

Download Full-Text

View:

213

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165

Author(s)

Keywords

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii

isolation methods

outer membrane vesicles

vaccine vehicle

Abstract

Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are spherical structures, naturally secreted by Gram-negative and Grampositive bacteria. EVs play a critical role in the modulation of immune responses, bioactive cargo delivery, and cellcell communication. The conventional method of EVs preparation involves the use of detergent (ultracentrifugation method). For the first time, we used a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based method in our study to isolate EVs from prokaryotic cells, namely Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. We then compared various features of this method with those of the ultracentrifugation method. Methods: Extraction of EVs was performed via sequential deoxycholate ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods. The physicochemical properties of the extracted EVs were compared via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SDS-PAGE, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Results: The protein content of the extracted EVs was 1. 6 and 0. 5 mg/mL, based on the ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods, respectively. According to the SDS-PAGE analysis, vesicle-associated proteins were located at 20-150 kDa. The SEM analysis showed that the extracted EVs had a diameter of 50-200 nm in both methods. The results of DLS analysis showed 4 populations of approximately 50-8000 nm in the ultracentrifugation method and approximately 100-2000 nm in the PEG-based method. The EVs extracted by the ultracentrifugation method showed higher negative charge densities in contrast to EVs extracted by the PEG-based method. Conclusion: Our result showed that PEG-based extraction is a fast, simple, and cost-effective method and EVs purity was within the acceptable range. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and the efficacy of EVs in clinical practices, especially as vaccine delivery vehicles.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

RABIEI, N., AHMADI BADI, S., Ettehad Marvasti, f., NEJAD SATTARI, T., VAZIRI, F., & SIADAT, S.D.. (2018). Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. VACCINE RESEARCH, 5(1), 27-31. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/344419/en

Vancouver: Copy

RABIEI N., AHMADI BADI S., Ettehad Marvasti f., NEJAD SATTARI T., VAZIRI F., SIADAT S.D.. Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. VACCINE RESEARCH[Internet]. 2018;5(1):27-31. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/344419/en

IEEE: Copy

N. RABIEI, S. AHMADI BADI, f. Ettehad Marvasti, T. NEJAD SATTARI, F. VAZIRI, and S.D. SIADAT, “Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165,” VACCINE RESEARCH, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/344419/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops