مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

235
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

288
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HUMAN LEPTOSPIROSIS

Pages

  1-7

Abstract

 Context: LEPTOSPIROSIS is a worldwide zoonotic infection which appears to be a re-emerging health problem. The clinical features of thedisease are broad ranging, but are often similar to those of other infections. As a result, the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of LEPTOSPIROSISis low and confirmation requires the use of laboratory tests.Evidence Acquisition: The disease is usually diagnosed in the laboratory by different methods such as direct microscopy, culture, serological methods and molecular methods. The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is considered the reference test among theseveral serological methods for LEPTOSPIROSIS diagnosis. However, isolation and identification of the microorganism allows for definitivediagnosis, and provides for epidemiological and prophylactic studies of this disease. Therefore, culture is a golden standard method.Polymerase chain reaction is a rapid, sensitive and specific means of detecting leptospiral infection, in contrast to serology tests. Further benefit is the ability to identify early infection especially during the first few days of the disease even before antibodies are detectable.Conclusions: Choice of test for diagnosis of LEPTOSPIROSIS depends on the stage of the disease. An ideal test will need to discriminate between LEPTOSPIROSIS and a broad spectrum of diseases that cause acute febrile illness and have overlapping clinical presentations.Although detection of antibodies is by itself no proof of a current infection, serological methods (such as MAT and ELISA) are often themost appropriate diagnostic methods.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHAKI, PEJVAK. (2016). CLINICAL LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HUMAN LEPTOSPIROSIS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTERIC PATHOGEN, 4(1), 1-7. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/347496/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHAKI PEJVAK. CLINICAL LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HUMAN LEPTOSPIROSIS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTERIC PATHOGEN[Internet]. 2016;4(1):1-7. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/347496/en

    IEEE: Copy

    PEJVAK KHAKI, “CLINICAL LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HUMAN LEPTOSPIROSIS,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTERIC PATHOGEN, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/347496/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button