مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

232
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

73
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL-KETAMINE VS PROPOFOL-FENTANYL FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION DURING UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY

Pages

  216-225

Abstract

 Background: Selection of the best sedative regimen during pediatric ENDOSCOPY with greater stability in hemodynamic parameters and fewer side effects is very important. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of PROPOFOL – KETAMINE versus PROPOFOL – FENTANYL in pediatric undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal ENDOSCOPY (UGIE).Methods: In this clinical trial, 130 CHILDREN aged 2 to 12 years (ASA physical status I or II) were examined. CHILDREN were divided into two groups. PROPOFOL (1.2 mg/kg) plus KETAMINE (1 mg/kg) was prescribed for the first group (Group PK). The second group received PROPOFOL (1.2 mg/kg) plus FENTANYL (1 mg/kg) (Group PF). Hemodynamic variables and SEDATION scale of patients were compared between two groups.Results: The mean age of the CHILDREN was 98.3±6.96 months and 97.15±3.56 months in group PK and group PF, respectively. Heart rate and respiratory rate values after induction in group PF were significantly lower than in group PK (p<0.05). Coughing, nausea and vomiting and Ramsey SEDATION score were significantly higher in group PK (p<0.05).Conclusion: Both combinations provided effective SEDATION in pediatric patients undergoing UGIE, but the PROPOFOL-ketamine combination resulted in stable hemodynamics and deeper SEDATION although with more side effects.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TAKZARE, ALIREZA, EBRAHIM SOLTANI, ALIREZA, MALEKI, ANAHID, NOORALISHAHI, BEHRANG, KAHEH, FARIBA, ARAB, SAGAR, & GOUDARZI, MEHRDAD. (2016). COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL-KETAMINE VS PROPOFOL-FENTANYL FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION DURING UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY. ARCHIVES OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2(3), 216-225. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/352452/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TAKZARE ALIREZA, EBRAHIM SOLTANI ALIREZA, MALEKI ANAHID, NOORALISHAHI BEHRANG, KAHEH FARIBA, ARAB SAGAR, GOUDARZI MEHRDAD. COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL-KETAMINE VS PROPOFOL-FENTANYL FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION DURING UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY. ARCHIVES OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE[Internet]. 2016;2(3):216-225. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/352452/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA TAKZARE, ALIREZA EBRAHIM SOLTANI, ANAHID MALEKI, BEHRANG NOORALISHAHI, FARIBA KAHEH, SAGAR ARAB, and MEHRDAD GOUDARZI, “COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL-KETAMINE VS PROPOFOL-FENTANYL FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION DURING UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY,” ARCHIVES OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 216–225, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/352452/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button