Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DEHGHANI M.; Montazer Lotf Elahi H.; MOEINI M.; BARDAL ROGHIEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES Year:2016 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 34-39

Download Full-Text

View:

158

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects

Author(s)

DEHGHANI M. | Montazer Lotf Elahi H. | MOEINI M. | BARDAL ROGHIEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Cone beam computed

tomography

Dental radiography

Digital radiography

Periodontal disease

Abstract

Background and Aim: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) produces highquality data in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of CBCT with intraoral digital and conventional radiography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects. Methods and Materials: In this diagnostic research, two hundred and eighteen artificial osseous defects (buccal and lingual infra-bony, inter proximal, horizontal, crater, dehiscence and fenestration defects) were shaped in 13 dry mandibles. CBCT and intraoral radiography with parallel technique by conventional film and digital sensor were compared with the standard reference (digital caliper). Inter and intra observer agreement were assessed using Intra class correlation co-efficient and Pearson correlation. Paired T-Test was applied for the comparison of absolute differences of conventional and digital intraoral radiography and CBCT measurements with the gold standard. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® v13. 0 statistical software. Results: Inter and intra observer agreement were both high for CBCT (ICC: α =0/88) but moderate for intraoral conventional radiography (ICC: α =0/54) and Digital radiography (ICC: α =0/73). No significant differences were detected between the observers for all the techniques (P> 0. 05). According to Paired T-test, mean difference for CBCT technique (0. 01mm) was lower than Digital radiography (0. 47mm) and conventional radiography (0. 63mm). CBCT allowed the measurement of all lesion types, but intraoral radiography did not allow the measurement of buccal and lingual defects. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the studied radiographic modalities are useful in identifying the periodontal bone defects. CBCT technique showed the highest accuracy in the measurement of periodontal bone defects compared with digital and conventional intraoral radiography.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DEHGHANI, M., Montazer Lotf Elahi, H., MOEINI, M., & BARDAL, ROGHIEH. (2016). Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, 1(1), 34-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/354473/en

Vancouver: Copy

DEHGHANI M., Montazer Lotf Elahi H., MOEINI M., BARDAL ROGHIEH. Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2016;1(1):34-39. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/354473/en

IEEE: Copy

M. DEHGHANI, H. Montazer Lotf Elahi, M. MOEINI, and ROGHIEH BARDAL, “Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/354473/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops