A CRITICAL LOOK ON THE ARTICLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOOSAVI KARIMY M.S.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAMEH-YE-MOFID Year:2000 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 (21) Page(s): 181-204

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

762

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL LOOK ON THE ARTICLE "CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE"

Author(s)

MOOSAVI KARIMY M.S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

The basis of that article is that the principality of Existences Mollasadra presented, in addition to that it has no obvious precedent at philosophy, it doesn’t answer to principal questions at ontology, lacks the fit and desirable epistemology results and from scientific and evaluative aspects is deprived of practical effects and blessings. On the contrary, principality of Mystic existence has a clear and long precedent and can reply our questions on ontology and also possesses epistemology results and practical effects and blessings. At the end, proportional to these premises and conclusions some proposals on correction and rebuilding the Islamic Philosophy has been rendered. In this article, all these claims have been deliberated and while answering to them, it has been established that, principally, the writer’s conception of the principality of Existence and its effects is wrong, hence, the premises and conclusions are also wrong. Furthermore, it has been shown that the presented proposals based on those wrong premises and conclusions instead of being constructive are destroying and preventive. As an alternative, it has been posed another proposal on correctness and rebuilding the Islamic philosophy at the end of this article.

Cites

THE LINGUISTIC ORIGINS OF THE DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL REALITY OF EXISTENCE

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOOSAVI KARIMY, M.S.. (2000). A CRITICAL LOOK ON THE ARTICLE "CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE". NAMEH-YE-MOFID, 6(1 (21)), 181-204. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/3569/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOOSAVI KARIMY M.S.. A CRITICAL LOOK ON THE ARTICLE "CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE". NAMEH-YE-MOFID[Internet]. 2000;6(1 (21)):181-204. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/3569/en

IEEE: Copy

M.S. MOOSAVI KARIMY, “A CRITICAL LOOK ON THE ARTICLE "CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCE",” NAMEH-YE-MOFID, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 181–204, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/3569/en

Related Journal Papers