مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

843
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF TWO PREPARATION DESIGN: SHOULDER AND HEAVY CHAMFER IN IPS E.MAX PRESS RESTORATIONS-IN VITRO

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background and Aim: MARGINAL INTEGRITY in all ceramic restorations is one of the important elements of the success rate. According to the importance of design preparation in the MARGINAL INTEGRITY, in this in-vitro study, decided to compare the MARGINAL INTEGRITY between 2 different types of the marginal preparation: SHOULDER and CLASSIC CHAMFER in IPS E.MAX PRESS restoration.Methods and Material: This experimental research has been done in vitro with the single blind technique. One standard die with 7 mm height, 5mm diameter was prepared by the milling machine. the preparation design consists half SHOULDER 90 degree and in the other half CLASSIC CHAMFER, with 1 mm depth in both of them and 10 degree tapering and then crowns were made of IPS E.MAX PRESS and after cementation, were ground at the buccolingually direction. Then they were coated by gold and observed under SEM. The data assessed by T-Test.Results: A difference between 2 types of marginal preparation was significant (p<0.05). Marginal gap in SHOULDER preparation was 15.45±0.79 and in CLASSIC CHAMFER site was 13.78±0.52.Conclusion: The marginal fitness in the CLASSIC CHAMFER preparation was better than SHOULDER preparation in all ceramic restorations.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    JALALIAN, EZZATOLLAH, ESMAEILI, MARYAM, ELIASI, MARYAM, & KESHAVARZI, GOLSA. (2011). THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF TWO PREPARATION DESIGN: SHOULDER AND HEAVY CHAMFER IN IPS E.MAX PRESS RESTORATIONS-IN VITRO. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 28(4 (86)), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/362068/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JALALIAN EZZATOLLAH, ESMAEILI MARYAM, ELIASI MARYAM, KESHAVARZI GOLSA. THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF TWO PREPARATION DESIGN: SHOULDER AND HEAVY CHAMFER IN IPS E.MAX PRESS RESTORATIONS-IN VITRO. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2011;28(4 (86)):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/362068/en

    IEEE: Copy

    EZZATOLLAH JALALIAN, MARYAM ESMAEILI, MARYAM ELIASI, and GOLSA KESHAVARZI, “THE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF TWO PREPARATION DESIGN: SHOULDER AND HEAVY CHAMFER IN IPS E.MAX PRESS RESTORATIONS-IN VITRO,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 28, no. 4 (86), pp. 0–0, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/362068/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top