مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,548
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD DETERMINATION METHODS

Pages

  35-54

Abstract

 AIM: the purpose of this study was to ananlyze & compare the anaerobic threshold determination methods. Method: Fifteen active young men (Average age± SD =21±1.32yrs., averageheight±SD = 178±5.2cm, averageweight ± SD = 64.2 ± 6.78 kg) were selected as subjects. Hoffman experimental protocol was used to determine heart rate deflection point (HRDP). During the completion of protocol, subjects heart rates were recorded every second via telemetry. At the same time, blood sampeling was accomplished in five phases via angiocat and analyzed for acid lactic concentration. Results: According to the findings, the S.D max method to determine the ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD is an accurate method, and there is no significant difference between S.DMAX and lactate method (168± 8.17 VS 167± 8.83; P= 0.84). On the other hand, results shwed significant difference among Black Bum (139.3± 0.3), %90 maximal heart rate (179.1± 1.19), Narita (146.6± 5.02) and L.Dmax (139.56±6.73), and lactate method (P<0.001;P<0.02,P<0.001;P<0.001). Conclusion: It could be suggested that S.DMAX method is an accurate and valid method to determine theanaerobic threshold. Therefore, the S.DMAX method could be a valid alternative for the traditional, expensive, and time-consuming lactate method. Thus, coaches and athletes can use the S.DMAX method for anaerobic threshoid determination and training intensity control.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NOORZAD DOLATABADI, H., & SIAHKOUHIAN, M.. (2004). THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD DETERMINATION METHODS. HARAKAT, -(20), 35-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/372877/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NOORZAD DOLATABADI H., SIAHKOUHIAN M.. THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD DETERMINATION METHODS. HARAKAT[Internet]. 2004;-(20):35-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/372877/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. NOORZAD DOLATABADI, and M. SIAHKOUHIAN, “THE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD DETERMINATION METHODS,” HARAKAT, vol. -, no. 20, pp. 35–54, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/372877/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button