Quality Assessment of Published Clinical Trials of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Between 1999 and 2018

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shateri Amiri Z.; HOSEINI S.S.; JARAHI L.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Epidemiology Year:2020 | Volume:16 | Issue:2 Page(s): 172-180

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

458

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Quality Assessment of Published Clinical Trials of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Between 1999 and 2018

Author(s)

Shateri Amiri Z. | HOSEINI S.S. | JARAHI L. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Clinical trialQ3

RandomizationQ1

BlindnessQ1

Allocation concealmentQ1

Quality assessmentQ1

CitataionQ1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Clinical trials are used extensively in the compilation of systematic review studies and clinical guidelines. Critical appraisal of articles is a part of systematic review writing and also effective in citation. This study aimed to evaluate quality of randomized Clinical trial articles of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences with consideration report of randomized, Blindness, and Allocation concealment methods in them. Methods: In this study, all randomized Clinical trials with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences affiliation indexed in PubMed by 2018 were evaluated. Results: Of 257 eligible articles, dentistry (n=44, 17. 1%), obstetrics and gynecology (n=28, 10. 9%) and internal medicine (n=23, 8. 9%) had the highest relative frequency of published randomized Clinical trial articles. Eithy-three articles (32. 3%) reported the Randomization method and most of them (86. 9%) used simple Randomization. Blinding was done in 138 papers (53. 7%) with double blinding being the most common (70. 2%). Only three articles (1. 2%) reported Allocation concealment. Conclusion: The report of "random allocation and Randomization" in articles was far less than acceptable. It may seem that there may be different biases in the methodology. Upholding the principles of scientific writing and avoiding errors and biases increase the validity of the scientific articles and citation, which is one of the criteria of the scientific ranking of top universities.

Cites

No record.

References

Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Trials Published in Persian Nursing Journals with More than 10 Years of Publishing Using the CASP Checklist

Cite

APA: Copy

Shateri Amiri, Z., HOSEINI, S.S., & JARAHI, L.. (2020). Quality Assessment of Published Clinical Trials of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Between 1999 and 2018. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 16(2 ), 172-180. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/377382/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shateri Amiri Z., HOSEINI S.S., JARAHI L.. Quality Assessment of Published Clinical Trials of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Between 1999 and 2018. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY[Internet]. 2020;16(2 ):172-180. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/377382/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. Shateri Amiri, S.S. HOSEINI, and L. JARAHI, “Quality Assessment of Published Clinical Trials of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Between 1999 and 2018,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, vol. 16, no. 2 , pp. 172–180, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/377382/en

Related Journal Papers