مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

431
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Prediction Between Logistic Regression, Discriminant Analysis, Decision Tree and Artificial Neural Network Models

Pages

  362-370

Abstract

 Background and Objectives: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy. In case of early detection, some of its complications can be prevented. The aim of this study was to investigate early prediction of GDM by logistic regression (LR), discriminant analysis (DA), decision tree (DT) and perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) and to compare these models. Methods: The medical files of 420 pregnant women (2010-12) in Kermanshah health centers were evaluated using convenience sampling. Demographic data, pregnancy-related variables, lab tests results, and a diagnosis of GDM according to a fasting blood sugar level of 92 or more were collected from their files. After fitting the four models, the performance of the models was compared and according to the criteria of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity (based on the ROC curve), the superior model was introduced. Results: Following the fitting of LR, DA, DT and perceptron ANN models, the following results were obtained. The Accuracy of the above models was 0. 81, 0. 83, 0. 78 and 0. 83, respectively, the Sensitivity of the models was 0. 50, 0. 63, 0. 58 and 0. 58, the Specificity of the models was 0. 96, 0. 93, 0. 87 and 0. 94, and the area under the ROC curve was 0. 86, 0. 78, 0. 73 and 0. 87, respectively. Conclusion: In predicting and categorizing the presence of GDM, the ANN model had a lower error rate and a higher area under the ROC curve compared to other models. It can be concluded that this model offers better predictions and is closer to reality than other models.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    REZAEI, M., FAKHRI, N., SHAHSAVARI, S., & RAJATI, F.. (2020). Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Prediction Between Logistic Regression, Discriminant Analysis, Decision Tree and Artificial Neural Network Models. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 15(4 ), 362-370. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/379556/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    REZAEI M., FAKHRI N., SHAHSAVARI S., RAJATI F.. Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Prediction Between Logistic Regression, Discriminant Analysis, Decision Tree and Artificial Neural Network Models. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY[Internet]. 2020;15(4 ):362-370. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/379556/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. REZAEI, N. FAKHRI, S. SHAHSAVARI, and F. RAJATI, “Comparison of Gestational Diabetes Prediction Between Logistic Regression, Discriminant Analysis, Decision Tree and Artificial Neural Network Models,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, vol. 15, no. 4 , pp. 362–370, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/379556/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top