COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC, CLINICAL AND MOTHER, FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN IN KERMAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASHRAF GANJOUEI T.; NADERI T.; ESHRATI B.; BABAPOUR N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Arak University Medical Sciences Year:2006 | Volume:9 | Issue:1 (34) Page(s): 49-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

786

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC, CLINICAL AND MOTHER, FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN IN KERMAN

Author(s)

ASHRAF GANJOUEI T. | NADERI T. | ESHRATI B. | BABAPOUR N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FETAL WEIGHTQ3

ULTRASOUNDQ3

BIRTH WEIGHTQ3

KERMANQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Estimation of FETAL WEIGHT is very important in preventing delivery complications and also in selecting delivery method. This is specially important in potential macrosomia, IUGR and also preterm labor. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of ultrasonic, clinical and mother, FETAL WEIGHT estimation in pregnant women in KERMAN.Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study 246 women with singleton, term pregnancies admitted for cesarean section within the following week, were studied. Estimation of FETAL WEIGHT (EFW) was done using sonography and then by two obstetricians and one senior resident who were unaware of the other clinical and ultrasonic results. Mothers' estimation of their baby weight was also asked. Statistical analysis was done by paired T and Chi square tests. We also used ROC (Radar Operating Characteristics) curve to compare the accuracy of different tests.Results: Fetal BIRTH WEIGHT was 3339±443 gr. In the 2500-4000 gr BIRTH WEIGHT the sensitivity of predicting clinical BIRTH WEIGHT was 11.8% with 99.6% specificity and for sonographic EFW was 12.6% with 92.1% specificity.Conclusion: Clinical estimation of BIRTH WEIGHT in term pregnancies is as accurate as routine ultrasonic estimation obtained in the preceding week of delivery.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ASHRAF GANJOUEI, T., NADERI, T., ESHRATI, B., & BABAPOUR, N.. (2006). COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC, CLINICAL AND MOTHER, FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN IN KERMAN. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), 9(1 (34)), 49-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/385057/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASHRAF GANJOUEI T., NADERI T., ESHRATI B., BABAPOUR N.. COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC, CLINICAL AND MOTHER, FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN IN KERMAN. ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ)[Internet]. 2006;9(1 (34)):49-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/385057/en

IEEE: Copy

T. ASHRAF GANJOUEI, T. NADERI, B. ESHRATI, and N. BABAPOUR, “COMPARING THE ACCURACY OF ULTRASONIC, CLINICAL AND MOTHER, FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN IN KERMAN,” ARAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (AMUJ), vol. 9, no. 1 (34), pp. 49–56, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/385057/en

Related Journal Papers