A Comparative Study of the Principle of Equal Equipment in Iranian Civil Procedure and US Federal Rules

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Ghanbari Nader; Nasiran Najafabadi Davood; SOLTANI REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Police Studies Quarterly Year:2020 | Volume:11 | Issue:43 Page(s): 140-166

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

778

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of the Principle of Equal Equipment in Iranian Civil Procedure and US Federal Rules

Author(s)

Ghanbari Nader | Nasiran Najafabadi Davood | SOLTANI REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Equal Equipment

Fair trial

Civil Procedure

US federal civil Procedure System

Abstract

Today, the right to a Fair trial is recognized as a fundamental right. Hence, procedural systems try to design their own rules and structures so that they can conduct proceedings fairly. But since justice is qualitative and non-objective, so measuring the fairness of the proceedings is not easy. In recent years, a theory has been developed to measure the fairness of the proceedings, which believes that the level of fairness can be measured by assessing the equality of the parties in accessing the equipment necessary for procedure and equality in the law they apply and equal in the outcome of similar caeses. The hearing was evaluated quantitatively. Equal Equipment In the sense of equality of arms between the parties involved in access to the equipment necessary for a fair hearing, it is inevitable and fair to observe it as a principle. In securing Equal Equipment litigants are the most appropriate person to defend their right to reject the claim of the other party and to conduct a fair hearing. The concept and position of the principle of Equal Equipment have been accepted the American and Iranian judicial systems and have been envisaged to enforce a number of institutions in the laws of justice. The study of the effect of this principle on the fairness of the proceedings and the efficiency of the institutions envisaged along with the identification of the institutions in other legal systems necessitated the present comparative study.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Ghanbari, Nader, Nasiran Najafabadi, Davood, & SOLTANI, REZA. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Principle of Equal Equipment in Iranian Civil Procedure and US Federal Rules. POLICE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 11(43 ), 140-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/386312/en

Vancouver: Copy

Ghanbari Nader, Nasiran Najafabadi Davood, SOLTANI REZA. A Comparative Study of the Principle of Equal Equipment in Iranian Civil Procedure and US Federal Rules. POLICE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;11(43 ):140-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/386312/en

IEEE: Copy

Nader Ghanbari, Davood Nasiran Najafabadi, and REZA SOLTANI, “A Comparative Study of the Principle of Equal Equipment in Iranian Civil Procedure and US Federal Rules,” POLICE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, vol. 11, no. 43 , pp. 140–166, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/386312/en

Related Journal Papers