Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Ershadinia MuhammadReza

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES Year:2021 | Volume:15 | Issue:27 Page(s): 3-22

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

223

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence

Author(s)

Ershadinia MuhammadReza | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Principality of existenceQ2

Validity of quiddityQ2

OntologyQ2

Abstract

Islamic philosophy, with its foundations of Ontology (ontological), has established the most basic foundations of rational theology. Uncertainty and gradation in these principles inflicts irreparable damage on theology in a special (more peculiar) sense and transforms it into another path with transformative consequences. Principality of existence has a prominent, visible and irreplaceable role among all the central principles of Ontology. Transcendent Wisdom has established this principle by recognizing its effective role. Opponents of it have, as a result of some inconsistencies results with their presuppositions, such as the unity of existence, distorted and induced doubt in its proofs. The main doubt is the accusation of circle doubt and circular reasoning by a seemingly heterogeneous spectrum, including anti-philosophers and some separatists (gradationists) in a polemical method. In this opportunity, attention will be paid to four reasons that are in this doubt. These reasons are: the argument of the goodness of existence, the argument based on the difference between the effects of external existence and the mental existence, the argument based on the refusal (impossibility) of doubt in gradation the quiddity and the argument of intensified (intensifying) motion. By presenting the contents of these arguments, the content of the doubt will also be tested against them. The analysis shows that the skepticism is due to insufficient attention to the principles of these arguments.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Ershadinia, MuhammadReza. (2021). Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, 15(27 ), 3-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/390529/en

Vancouver: Copy

Ershadinia MuhammadReza. Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2021;15(27 ):3-22. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/390529/en

IEEE: Copy

MuhammadReza Ershadinia, “Investigation of Circle Doubt (Obfuscation) and Circular Reasoning to the Evidence of the Principality of Existence,” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTRINES, vol. 15, no. 27 , pp. 3–22, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/390529/en

Related Journal Papers