Reasons for disagreements and opinions of crash experts

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sholeh Keramat Allah; kashfi seyyed saeid; Kiyamehr Morad Ali

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES Year:2020 | Volume:- | Issue:58 Page(s): 71-94

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

337

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Reasons for disagreements and opinions of crash experts

Author(s)

Sholeh Keramat Allah | kashfi seyyed saeid | Kiyamehr Morad Ali | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AccidentQ2

ExpertQ1

DisagreementQ1

TheoryQ1

Abstract

Expert opinions have a special place in proving claims because they are used as a counterpart in order to increase the judge's knowledge in identifying a specialized subject. Due to this importance, in preparing Expert opinions and creating a unity of procedure, it is necessary to recognize the reasons for differences in presenting Expert opinions, and after recognizing them, to take action to eliminate them, which is the mission of this important research. In terms of the purpose of this research, it is applied and in terms of method, it is descriptive-survey. A 26-item questionnaire was formed in the Likert scale. The results were first analyzed using descriptive statistics and then using SPSS software and one-sample t-test. Findings Documentary studies of this study showed that Experts have the most Disagreement on the issues of applying Note 3 Article 14 of the Law on Investigation of Violations, speeding intervention in the cause of total Accidents, fake Accidents and pedestrian Accidents. Also, the results of the questionnaire were ranked using Friedman test. Weakness in equipment and technology, weakness in education and weakness in rules and regulations, respectively, are the most important reasons for differences of opinion of Experts. Conclusion In order to achieve the same procedure in providing Expert opinions and reducing differences, recognizing the root causes of Accidents is inevitable. This will be possible by upgrading effective equipment and technologies in this field, increasing specialized training, and amending existing laws and regulations.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Sholeh, Keramat Allah, kashfi, seyyed saeid, & Kiyamehr, Morad Ali. (2020). Reasons for disagreements and opinions of crash experts. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES, -(58 ), 71-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/393879/en

Vancouver: Copy

Sholeh Keramat Allah, kashfi seyyed saeid, Kiyamehr Morad Ali. Reasons for disagreements and opinions of crash experts. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;-(58 ):71-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/393879/en

IEEE: Copy

Keramat Allah Sholeh, seyyed saeid kashfi, and Morad Ali Kiyamehr, “Reasons for disagreements and opinions of crash experts,” TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES, vol. -, no. 58 , pp. 71–94, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/393879/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops