COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS RATE OF FERRIC SULFATE PULPOTOMY METHOD IN SECOND PRIMARY MOLARS USING ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL AND ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NEMAT ELAHI H.; RAMEZANI NAHID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

820

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS RATE OF FERRIC SULFATE PULPOTOMY METHOD IN SECOND PRIMARY MOLARS USING ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL AND ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTS

Author(s)

NEMAT ELAHI H. | RAMEZANI NAHID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PULPOTOMYQ3

FERRIC SUIFATEQ3

PRIMARY TEETHQ3

ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL CEMENTQ3

ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY is a safe and effective method of the PULPOTOMY of PRIMARY TEETH. But the results of different studies indicate low success rate of ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY in comparison to Formocresol PULPOTOMY and a portion of these failures may be related to stimulating and harmful effects of zinc oxide Eugenol paste. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the clinical and radiographic success rate of ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY of primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol and ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTs in order to determine the more suitable pulp cappingmaterial for ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY.Methods: In this randomized trial study, 140 primary molar teeth in children between3-5 years old, with the treatment plan of PULPOTOMY were randomly allotted to one of two groups; ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY with zinc oxide eugenol and ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTs. After treatment, pulpotomized teeth were double blindly evaluated clinically and radio graphically and Fisher's exact test was used for analysis of data.Results: Clinical success rate in one year evaluation in two groups of zinc oxide eugenol and Zinc polycarboxylate was 98.1% and 93.9%, respectively that was not significantly different. (P=0.34). In one year evaluation, radiographic success rate was 96.30% in zinc oxide eugenol group and 91.8% in zinc polycarboxylate group but this difference was also not significant(P=0.42).Conclusion: In ferric sulfate PULPOTOMY, it is not preferable to use ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTs as a subbase instead of ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL CEMENT.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NEMAT ELAHI, H., & RAMEZANI, NAHID. (2007). COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS RATE OF FERRIC SULFATE PULPOTOMY METHOD IN SECOND PRIMARY MOLARS USING ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL AND ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 16(1), 57-67. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/399553/en

Vancouver: Copy

NEMAT ELAHI H., RAMEZANI NAHID. COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS RATE OF FERRIC SULFATE PULPOTOMY METHOD IN SECOND PRIMARY MOLARS USING ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL AND ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2007;16(1):57-67. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/399553/en

IEEE: Copy

H. NEMAT ELAHI, and NAHID RAMEZANI, “COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS RATE OF FERRIC SULFATE PULPOTOMY METHOD IN SECOND PRIMARY MOLARS USING ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL AND ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENTS,” JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/399553/en

Related Journal Papers