COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EVALUATION (OSCE) AND TRADITIONAL ON NURSING STUDENTS SATISFACTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

CHEHRZAD M.M.; SHAFIEI POUR Z.; MIRZAEI MAHSHID; KAZEMNEJAD E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2004 | Volume:13 | Issue:50 Page(s): 8-13

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,185

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EVALUATION (OSCE) AND TRADITIONAL ON NURSING STUDENTS SATISFACTION

Author(s)

CHEHRZAD M.M. | SHAFIEI POUR Z. | MIRZAEI MAHSHID | KAZEMNEJAD E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENTQ3

PERSONAL SATISFACTIONQ2

STUDENTQ3

NURSINGQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluation is the last stage of educational activities, and clinical practice is an important part of NURSING education and the evaluation of NURSING clinical practice is essential in overall evaluation. Objective: This study was carried out to compare two methods of clinical evaluation (OSCE and traditional) on NURSING STUDENTs satisfaction.Materials and Methods: In this descriptive comparative study, all the NURSING STUDENTs of Rasht NURSING faculty who were trained in pediatric wards were randomly divided into two groups, one group evaluated by OSCE, and other group by traditional method. Then, in order to determine the effect of evaluation methods, STUDENT's satisfaction was checked through a satisfaction form. Data were gathered by checklists for nine stations, satisfactory rating scale on 6 domains and traditional evaluation form.Results: The highest rate of STUDENTs satisfaction in all domains belonged to OSCE group (P<0005).Conclusion: OSCE can evaluate NURSING STUDENT's clinical skills more than the other methods and can trigger more satisfaction among them

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

CHEHRZAD, M.M., SHAFIEI POUR, Z., MIRZAEI, MAHSHID, & KAZEMNEJAD, E.. (2004). COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EVALUATION (OSCE) AND TRADITIONAL ON NURSING STUDENTS SATISFACTION . JOURNAL OF GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 13(50), 8-13. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/40243/en

Vancouver: Copy

CHEHRZAD M.M., SHAFIEI POUR Z., MIRZAEI MAHSHID, KAZEMNEJAD E.. COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EVALUATION (OSCE) AND TRADITIONAL ON NURSING STUDENTS SATISFACTION . JOURNAL OF GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2004;13(50):8-13. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/40243/en

IEEE: Copy

M.M. CHEHRZAD, Z. SHAFIEI POUR, MAHSHID MIRZAEI, and E. KAZEMNEJAD, “COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EVALUATION (OSCE) AND TRADITIONAL ON NURSING STUDENTS SATISFACTION ,” JOURNAL OF GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 13, no. 50, pp. 8–13, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/40243/en

Related Journal Papers