COMPARISON OF MEM AND NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIRZAJANI A.; AFSHARI A.; JAFARI A.R.; ALMASI A.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2014 | Volume:19 | Issue:3 (76) Page(s): 234-241

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,183

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MEM AND NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES

Author(s)

MIRZAJANI A. | AFSHARI A. | JAFARI A.R. | ALMASI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSEQ3

MEM DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPYQ3

NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPYQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSE values of two dynamic retinoscopy methods; monocular estimate method (MEM) and NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY.Methods: In this study 48 patients (29 men) with normal visual system underwent MEM and Nott retinoscopy.The agreement between the two methods was tested using Bland-Altman method. The correlation between data was tested using Spearman non-parametric method.Results: Mean age of the patients was 23.2±9.3 (range, 18-36) years. Mean ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSE values of MEM and NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY were +1.01±0.67 and +0.84±0.53 D, respectively with mean difference of 0.18±0.38 and 95% limits of agreement of ±0.74. Based on Spearman's non-parametric method, there was a significant correlation between differences and mean value ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSE of the two methods (R=0.41, P=0.004).Conclusion: Despite the difference between the two methods was small, this difference depends on the degree of the response to some extent and this difference may increase in higher values of ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSE.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MIRZAJANI, A., AFSHARI, A., JAFARI, A.R., & ALMASI, A.. (2014). COMPARISON OF MEM AND NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES. BINA, 19(3 (76)), 234-241. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/403979/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIRZAJANI A., AFSHARI A., JAFARI A.R., ALMASI A.. COMPARISON OF MEM AND NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES. BINA[Internet]. 2014;19(3 (76)):234-241. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/403979/en

IEEE: Copy

A. MIRZAJANI, A. AFSHARI, A.R. JAFARI, and A. ALMASI, “COMPARISON OF MEM AND NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES,” BINA, vol. 19, no. 3 (76), pp. 234–241, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/403979/en

Related Journal Papers