COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DORRI RAHELEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management Year:2015 | Volume:30 | Issue:2 Page(s): 471-494

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,781

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES

Author(s)

DORRI RAHELEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINESQ2

PERFORMANCEQ2

COMMON FEATURESQ2

SEMANTIC FEATURESQ2

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate the PERFORMANCE of five SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES available on the web, using 45 criteria in the form of a researcher-made checklist. Criteria provided in the checklist include both common and SEMANTIC FEATURES. Common criteria or features are those applicable to all search engines and semantic ones are those applicable only to SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES. Findings show that the selected search engines do not have suitable PERFORMANCE and expected efficiency. DuckDuckGo gained the highest points, considering regular features. Cluuz is in the second place with 20 points and Hakia with 18 points was in the third place. Lexxe and Factbites, with scores of 15 and 10 were placed in the next categories according to their points. In SEMANTIC FEATURES, DuckDuckGo with 10.65 points was in the first place; Hakia with 9.99 points was in the second place, and then the search engines Cluuz with 8.66 Points, Lexxe with 8.65 points and Factbites with 7.32 points were allocated to the next levels. The results also indicated that on the whole, considering ordinary and SEMANTIC FEATURES, DuckDuckGo with 31.65, Cluuz with 28.66, Hakia with 27.99, Lexxe with 23.65 and Factbites with 17.32 points got the highest scores.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DORRI, RAHELEH. (2015). COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), 30(2), 471-494. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/404028/en

Vancouver: Copy

DORRI RAHELEH. COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY)[Internet]. 2015;30(2):471-494. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/404028/en

IEEE: Copy

RAHELEH DORRI, “COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 471–494, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/404028/en

Related Journal Papers