The Potentials of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts in the Recognition of Randomized Controlled Trials' Texts and their Main Sections

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASADI ADELEH; SOTOUDEH HAJAR; ABBASPOUR JAVAD; Fakhr Ahmad Mostafa

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health Information Management Year:2020 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 (74) Page(s): 181-188

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

513

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Potentials of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts in the Recognition of Randomized Controlled Trials' Texts and their Main Sections

Author(s)

ASADI ADELEH | SOTOUDEH HAJAR | ABBASPOUR JAVAD | Fakhr Ahmad Mostafa | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Text SimilarityQ1

Cochrane Reviewers' CommentsQ1

Citation ContextsQ1

Natural Language ProcessingQ1

Abstract

Introduction: Meta-textuality can provide effective medium for facilitating information retrieval and machine learning. This study explored the strengths of two types of meta-texts (i. e., reviewers' comments and Citation Contexts) in correct classification and recognition of their related texts and main sections at abstract level. Methods: In this descriptive study with quantitative content analysis method, 846 randomized controlled trials were assessed; and their reviewers' comments and Citation Contexts were extracted from Cochrane reviews and Colil databases. Thirty seed documents were randomly selected as queries, and their abstract similarities to the test collection and the main sections (IMRaD: introduction, method, results, discussion) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to analyze the performance of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts individually and in combination. Results: The Citation Contexts’ area under the curve (0. 807) was higher than the Cochrane comments' (0. 638), and reached its highest for their combination (0. 936). The former had the highest performance in correct classification of the introduction section (0. 661), and the latter in correct recognition of the methodology section (0. 606). Conclusion: Cochrane reviewers’ comments and the Citation Contexts had the potential of correct classification of the related texts. The former did well in identifying the methodology section, while the latter in identifying the introduction section. Combining the two systems can boost their power in identifying the discussion section. The results can have implications for Natural Language Processing, machine learning systems, text categorization, retrieval, and summarization.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ASADI, ADELEH, SOTOUDEH, HAJAR, ABBASPOUR, JAVAD, & Fakhr Ahmad, Mostafa. (2020). The Potentials of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts in the Recognition of Randomized Controlled Trials' Texts and their Main Sections. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 17(4 (74) ), 181-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/411100/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASADI ADELEH, SOTOUDEH HAJAR, ABBASPOUR JAVAD, Fakhr Ahmad Mostafa. The Potentials of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts in the Recognition of Randomized Controlled Trials' Texts and their Main Sections. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2020;17(4 (74) ):181-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/411100/en

IEEE: Copy

ADELEH ASADI, HAJAR SOTOUDEH, JAVAD ABBASPOUR, and Mostafa Fakhr Ahmad, “The Potentials of Cochrane Reviewers' Comments and Citation Contexts in the Recognition of Randomized Controlled Trials' Texts and their Main Sections,” HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 17, no. 4 (74) , pp. 181–188, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/411100/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops