COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF UTEROBRUSH AND PIPELLE IN THE EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI M.A.S.; HASHEMI MOHAMMAD; HOSSEINI B.A.S.; VALAEI NASER

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research in Medicine Year:2010 | Volume:34 | Issue:2 Page(s): 107-110

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

534

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF UTEROBRUSH AND PIPELLE IN THE EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLES

Author(s)

HOSSEINI M.A.S. | HASHEMI MOHAMMAD | HOSSEINI B.A.S. | VALAEI NASER | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ENDOMETRIAL CANCERQ3

PIPELLEQ3

UTEROBRUSHQ3

HYSTERECTOMYQ3

Abstract

Background: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER is the most frequent cancer in the female genital system. Nowadays outpatient diagnostic procedures like PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH have facilitated the diagnosis and treatment of ENDOMETRIAL CANCER in early stages in high-risk patients. This study has been done to compare the accuracy and tissue sufficiency of biopsy by PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH.Methods: Between 2005 and 2007, 70 candidates admitted for HYSTERECTOMY in Imam Hossein Hospital entered a clinical trial study. Under local or general anesthesia, biopsies were taken by PIPELLE and then UTEROBRUSH or vice versa. The order of using PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH was selected randomly. The samples were sent to the pathology department and examined by an expert pathologist. The results of endometrial biopsies by PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH were analyzed. After that the cases were grouped (each group consisted of 35 patients) according to the order of using the PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH.Results: The endometrial samples sufficiency from UTEROBRUSH and PIPELLE were 68.1% and 87.1%, respectively. The positive predictive value of PIPELLE was 100% and negative predictive value was 84%. These values for UTEROBRUSH were 100% and 90% respectively.Conclusion: It seems that PIPELLE is better for obtaining sufficient size samples. However in sufficient samples, UTEROBRUSH has higher sensitivity and accuracy. Order of using PIPELLE and UTEROBRUSH caused no significant difference in the results.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, M.A.S., HASHEMI, MOHAMMAD, HOSSEINI, B.A.S., & VALAEI, NASER. (2010). COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF UTEROBRUSH AND PIPELLE IN THE EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLES. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, 34(2), 107-110. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/41596/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI M.A.S., HASHEMI MOHAMMAD, HOSSEINI B.A.S., VALAEI NASER. COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF UTEROBRUSH AND PIPELLE IN THE EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLES. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI[Internet]. 2010;34(2):107-110. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/41596/en

IEEE: Copy

M.A.S. HOSSEINI, MOHAMMAD HASHEMI, B.A.S. HOSSEINI, and NASER VALAEI, “COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF UTEROBRUSH AND PIPELLE IN THE EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLES,” PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/41596/en

Related Journal Papers