COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VISUAL ACUITY AFTER PHACOEMULCIFICATION WITH ASPHERICAL AND SPHERICAL HYDROPHILIC IOL IMPLANTATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ROHANI M.; DELFAZA BAHER S.; BARKHORDARI YAZDI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2011 | Volume:16 | Issue:4 (65) Page(s): 291-296

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,025

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VISUAL ACUITY AFTER PHACOEMULCIFICATION WITH ASPHERICAL AND SPHERICAL HYDROPHILIC IOL IMPLANTATION

Author(s)

ROHANI M. | DELFAZA BAHER S. | BARKHORDARI YAZDI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PHACOEMULSIFICATIONQ3

INTRAOCULAR LENSQ3

ASPHERICALQ3

SPHERICALQ3

CONTRAST SENSITIVITYQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare aspheric and SPHERICAL hydrophilic INTRAOCULAR LENSes (IOLs) in terms of CONTRAST SENSITIVITY and visual acuity in photopic and mesopic conditions.Methods: This triple-blind randomized clinical trial was performed on 40 eyes of 40 patients at Al-Zahra Eye Center, Zahedan, Iran. The eyes were randomized to standard PHACOEMULSIFICATION procedure with SPHERICAL (Adapt, B& L) or ASPHERICAL (Adapt AO, B& L) IOLs. All operation were performed using the Alcon Infinity system by one surgeon and the IOL was placed within the capsular bag. Two months postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in mesopic condition with brightness value of 8cd/m 2 as well as CONTRAST SENSITIVITY with BCVA in mesopic and photopic conditions with and without glare of 3cd/m 2 were determined using the Metrovision Monelci CONTRAST SENSITIVITY Device (53.8lux).Quality of vision was compared between the two groups by comparing average CONTRAST SENSITIVITY at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 cycle per degree using t-test.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding BCVA or CONTRAST SENSITIVITY at different frequencies under photopic or mesopic conditions with pupil diameter of 5mm, and under photopic or mesopic conditions with glare.Conclusion: Considering the risk of visual loss due to IOL decentration. Besides CONTRAST SENSITIVITY, other factors such as price and ease of insertion and access should be considered for determining the IOL of choice in cataract surgery.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ROHANI, M., DELFAZA BAHER, S., & BARKHORDARI YAZDI, H.. (2011). COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VISUAL ACUITY AFTER PHACOEMULCIFICATION WITH ASPHERICAL AND SPHERICAL HYDROPHILIC IOL IMPLANTATION. BINA, 16(4 (65)), 291-296. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42928/en

Vancouver: Copy

ROHANI M., DELFAZA BAHER S., BARKHORDARI YAZDI H.. COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VISUAL ACUITY AFTER PHACOEMULCIFICATION WITH ASPHERICAL AND SPHERICAL HYDROPHILIC IOL IMPLANTATION. BINA[Internet]. 2011;16(4 (65)):291-296. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42928/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ROHANI, S. DELFAZA BAHER, and H. BARKHORDARI YAZDI, “COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND VISUAL ACUITY AFTER PHACOEMULCIFICATION WITH ASPHERICAL AND SPHERICAL HYDROPHILIC IOL IMPLANTATION,” BINA, vol. 16, no. 4 (65), pp. 291–296, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42928/en

Related Journal Papers