مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

4,267
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATIONS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY

Pages

  69-76

Abstract

 Background and Purpose: For the past years, tubes have been inserted into the stomach via the nose (NASOGASTRIC TUBE: NGT) for the purpose of evacuating gas and liquid routinely, and for the prevention of nausea, and vomiting. However, there are no evidences regarding its efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post ABDOMINAL SURGERY COMPLICATIONS either NGT inserted or not.Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial comparative study, 100 consecutive patients who underwent ABDOMINAL SURGERY (elective or urgency) were included in the study. They were divided in two groups: one was inserted NGT before anesthesia and remained until after initiation of bowel movement (control) and another without an incubated (case).Results: Post surgery COMPLICATIONS was similar in both groups (P>0.05): nausea (26% vs. 18%), vomiting (4% vs. 6%), fever (10% vs. 6%), bowel movement time (22.8±10.84 vs. 21.84±9.21), pulmonary COMPLICATIONS (2% in both), wound infection (4% in both), duration of stay in hospital (2.58±1.62 vs. 2.47±1.6 days) in controls and cases respectively. Only sore throat was significantly more frequent in control group (74% vs. 16%).Conclusion: These results suggest that routine and prophylactic insertion of NGT is not necessary, cannot reduce COMPLICATIONS and also leads to patients' discomfort. Therefore, it must be saved in some specific indications.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAHMANI BOUEINI, N., YAGHOUBZADEH, A., & SHAHBAZNEZHAD, L.. (2008). EVALUATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATIONS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 17(62), 69-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/44542/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAHMANI BOUEINI N., YAGHOUBZADEH A., SHAHBAZNEZHAD L.. EVALUATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATIONS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2008;17(62):69-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/44542/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. RAHMANI BOUEINI, A. YAGHOUBZADEH, and L. SHAHBAZNEZHAD, “EVALUATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATIONS IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 17, no. 62, pp. 69–76, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/44542/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button