مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

628
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS OF MTA AND ROOT MTA AS TWO ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS

Pages

  22-28

Abstract

 Introduction: This study was carried out to compare two RETROGRADE FILLING materials entitled mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Root MTA (RMTA) in regard to their MARGINAL ADAPTATION and surface defects.Method: In this study twenty extracted human teeth were used. In all teeth after cleaning and shaping, the root canals were obturated by gutta-percha and root canal sealer. After that in each tooth the 3 millimeter of root end was resected and a retrograde cavity was prepared. Then, the teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups. In group I the retrograde cavities were filled by MTA and in group II the cavities were filled by RMTA. Then using Confocal-microscope and STEREOMICROSCOPE the location of the gaps between filling material and cavity walls was determined and measured by AutoCAD and Photoshop soft wares. Finally the obtained data were analyzed by one sided Fisher’s exact test.Results: There was a significant difference in MARGINAL ADAPTATION between two types of MTA (p<0.029). Only one tooth, in MTA group showed gap between cavity walls and root-end filling material, however, 60% of the teeth in RMTA group showed gap in their margins. In regard to surface defect there was a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.016). In MTA group 50% of the cases showed a defect on their surface, while in the RMTA group except one case, none of the cavities showed surface defect.Conclusion: It can be concluded that MTA has better MARGINAL ADAPTATION than RMTA.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    PARIROKH, M., BEHDANI, FAEZEH, EGHBAL, M.J., & ASGARY, SAEID. (2006). A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS OF MTA AND ROOT MTA AS TWO ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS. JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 13(1), 22-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/45/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PARIROKH M., BEHDANI FAEZEH, EGHBAL M.J., ASGARY SAEID. A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS OF MTA AND ROOT MTA AS TWO ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS. JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;13(1):22-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/45/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. PARIROKH, FAEZEH BEHDANI, M.J. EGHBAL, and SAEID ASGARY, “A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS OF MTA AND ROOT MTA AS TWO ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS,” JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/45/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button