مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,017
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO TESTS (RAPID UREASE AND ELISA) FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL DISCOMFORT

Pages

  19-23

Abstract

 Background and Objectives: HELICOBACTER PYLORI (HP) infection in man has several disease outcomes, varying from asymptomatic chronic gastric inflammation to HP-associated dyspepsia, PEPTIC ULCER disease, gastric adenocarcinoma, and MALT lymphoma. This study was undertaken to evaluate HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection and assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of two commonly used diagnostic tests for HELICOBACTER PYLORI i.e. Rapid urease and ELISA tests.Materials and Methods: The present prospective study was performed on 120 patients (with dyspepsia) referred to Imam Khomeini hospital in Tabriz. Antral biopsy specimens were taken for RAPID UREASE TEST and IgG anti-HELICOBACTER PYLORI was evaluated with a serological test (ELISA). If both the tests were positive, the patients were taken into account to be HELICOBACTER PYLORI positive. Results: In this study, patients with two positive tests (rapid urease as well as ELISA) were considered to be HELICOBACTER PYLORI positive. Of the total patients studied, 86 (71.6%) were found HELICOBACTER PYLORI positive and 34 (28.4%) were negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were as follows respectively: RAPID UREASE TEST 89%, 92.6%, 97%, 75.8% and for ELISA test: 97%, 75.8%, 89%, 92.6%. Conclusions: Our results indicate that due to non- invasiveness and high sensitivity of ELISA method in comparison to RAPID UREASE TEST, it is favourable to perform this test for H.pylori in suspicious patients and if the test is positive with clinical presentation, endoscopic procedures should be applied.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAHNAMA, B., & FATAHI, E.. (2002). COMPARISON OF TWO TESTS (RAPID UREASE AND ELISA) FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL DISCOMFORT . MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, -(53), 19-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/47612/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAHNAMA B., FATAHI E.. COMPARISON OF TWO TESTS (RAPID UREASE AND ELISA) FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL DISCOMFORT . MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2002;-(53):19-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/47612/en

    IEEE: Copy

    B. RAHNAMA, and E. FATAHI, “COMPARISON OF TWO TESTS (RAPID UREASE AND ELISA) FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL DISCOMFORT ,” MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. -, no. 53, pp. 19–23, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/47612/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top