مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

641
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CORNEAL THICKNESS IN CANDIDATES FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK) USING THREE METHODS, ORBSCAN II, PENTACAM, AND ULTRASOUND

Pages

  13-18

Keywords

PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK)Q1

Abstract

 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the central CORNEAL THICKNESS measured by ORBSCAN II, ULTRASOUND and PENTACAM in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was carried out during one year in Feyz hospital, Isfahan city, Iran in 2013. The sample included 84 eyes of 84 patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy with no history of corneal or intra-ocular surgery. Each patient's CORNEAL THICKNESS was measured and recorded using 3 devices of Orbscan, ULTRASOUND and PENTACAM. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software.Findings: Central CORNEAL THICKNESS (CCT) measured by ORBSCAN II had good correlation with those measured by ULTRASOUND (r=0.077, P<0.050). ORBSCAN II had good correlation in central CORNEAL THICKNESS measurement with PENTACAM (r=0.072, P<0.050). Peripheral CORNEAL THICKNESS (PCT) measured by PENTACAM had good correlation with those measured by ULTRASOUND and there was no considerable discrepancy between the two methods. ORBSCAN II had good correlation in superior, inferior and temporal CORNEAL THICKNESS but there was considerable discrepancy in nasal CORNEAL THICKNESS measured by ORBSCAN II with those of ULTRASOUND (r=0.420, P<0.050, t=-2.74, P=0.010).Conclusion: PENTACAM and ORBSCAN II showed good correlation with ULTRASOUND in central CORNEAL THICKNESS measurement; however, in peripheral CORNEAL THICKNESS measurement, PENTACAM had better correlation compared to ORBSCAN II in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAZMJOO, HASSAN, & FAKHRIZADEH, SHIRIN. (2017). COMPARISON OF CORNEAL THICKNESS IN CANDIDATES FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK) USING THREE METHODS, ORBSCAN II, PENTACAM, AND ULTRASOUND. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 35(417), 13-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/50027/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAZMJOO HASSAN, FAKHRIZADEH SHIRIN. COMPARISON OF CORNEAL THICKNESS IN CANDIDATES FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK) USING THREE METHODS, ORBSCAN II, PENTACAM, AND ULTRASOUND. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2017;35(417):13-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/50027/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HASSAN RAZMJOO, and SHIRIN FAKHRIZADEH, “COMPARISON OF CORNEAL THICKNESS IN CANDIDATES FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK) USING THREE METHODS, ORBSCAN II, PENTACAM, AND ULTRASOUND,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 35, no. 417, pp. 13–18, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/50027/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top