STANDARD PRK VERSUS Q-VALUE ADJUSTED ABLATION PRK IN REFRACTIVE ERRORS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASROLLAHI KOBRA; ATTARZADEH HOSSEIN; MASJEDI AMIN; JENAB KEYVAN; KAVOSH MORVARID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Year:2011 | Volume:28 | Issue:115 Page(s): 909-914

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

811

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STANDARD PRK VERSUS Q-VALUE ADJUSTED ABLATION PRK IN REFRACTIVE ERRORS

Author(s)

Keywords

OCULAR REFRACTIONQ3

PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMYQ3

CONTRAST SENSITIVITYQ3

PATIENT SATISFACTIONQ2

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the effect of standard PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY (PRK) and Q-value adjusted ablation PRK with Allegretto Eye-Q on the OCULAR REFRACTION.Methods: In this clinical trial study performed in Parsian clinic of Isfahan, 75 candidates for photorefractive surgery were included. All of these patients underwent standard PRK in one eye and Q-value adjusted ablation PRK in the other eye. The efficacy of therapy was measured by visual acuity, CONTRAST SENSITIVITY, subjective refraction and patients’ satisfaction, 3 months after the surgery.Finding: The mean score of postoperative visual acuity in standard PRK group and Q-value adjusted group was 10.48 ± 1.38 and 10.51 ± 1.22 respectively without correction. The mean postoperative refraction of standard PRK and Q-value adjusted PRK was 0 ± 0.37 and 0.05 ± 0.3 respectively. There was no significant statistical difference in visual acuity, refraction, CONTRAST SENSITIVITY and postoperative satisfaction between the two groups.Conclusion: There is no significant difference between efficacy of standard PRK and Q-value adjusted PRK in optimizing visual acuity, subjective refraction, CONTRAST SENSITIVITY and PATIENT SATISFACTION.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NASROLLAHI, KOBRA, ATTARZADEH, HOSSEIN, MASJEDI, AMIN, JENAB, KEYVAN, & KAVOSH, MORVARID. (2011). STANDARD PRK VERSUS Q-VALUE ADJUSTED ABLATION PRK IN REFRACTIVE ERRORS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 28(115), 909-914. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/50419/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASROLLAHI KOBRA, ATTARZADEH HOSSEIN, MASJEDI AMIN, JENAB KEYVAN, KAVOSH MORVARID. STANDARD PRK VERSUS Q-VALUE ADJUSTED ABLATION PRK IN REFRACTIVE ERRORS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2011;28(115):909-914. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/50419/en

IEEE: Copy

KOBRA NASROLLAHI, HOSSEIN ATTARZADEH, AMIN MASJEDI, KEYVAN JENAB, and MORVARID KAVOSH, “STANDARD PRK VERSUS Q-VALUE ADJUSTED ABLATION PRK IN REFRACTIVE ERRORS,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 28, no. 115, pp. 909–914, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/50419/en

Related Journal Papers