COMPARISON OF DV PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SUNSCREENS OF SPF=30 AND SPF=100

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADI F.; JORJANI M.; AMIR JAVANBAKHT A.M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Researcher Bulletin of Medical Sciences Year:2002 | Volume:7 | Issue:3 (29) Page(s): 217-222

Download Full-Text

View:

250

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DV PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SUNSCREENS OF SPF=30 AND SPF=100

Author(s)

AHMADI F. | JORJANI M. | AMIR JAVANBAKHT A.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SUNBURN

SUNSCREEN

SUN PROTECTION FACTOR

Abstract

Background: Recurrent SUNBURN, a frequent problem observed in dermatology clinics, could lead to skin aging and malignant or benign neoplasm. This may be sufficiently prohibited by SUNSCREENs, however, these products are available with different SPFs. We have compared two different SUNSCREENs with SPF=30 and SPF=100 in mountain climbers in Tehran in 2001. Materials and methods: 76 candidates (152 samples) were included in this clinical trial. Each side of the candidate's face was randomly selected as "experiment" or "control". Those sides as "experiment" were received 0.3ml of a-DV SUNSCREEN with SPF=30.0n the other hand, sides as "control" were received 0.3ml of Photoderm SUNSCREEN with SPF=100. The procedure was repeated 2.5 hours later. Having at least 5-hour mountain climbing, candidates were examined for signs of erythema, itching and burning sensation. Mc nemar and chisquare were used for data analysis. Results: The study population included 30 males and 36 females with the mean age of 21.8±3.5 years. Both SUNSCREENs effectively protect against SUNBURN (88.2% for SPF=30 and 82.9% for SPF=100, p<0.0005). Erythema and itching were reported in 11.8% and 6.5% of cases in the "experiment" group, however, for the "control" group these were 17.1 % and 7.8%, respectively. Moreover, 89.4% of the "experiment" and 85.5% of "control" subjects were satisfied. These differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Results have showed no significant difference between the two SUNSCREENs. It seems reasonable to use SUNSCREEN with SPF=30 instead of those with SPF=100, to prevent undesirable side effects.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADI, F., JORJANI, M., & AMIR JAVANBAKHT, A.M.. (2002). COMPARISON OF DV PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SUNSCREENS OF SPF=30 AND SPF=100. RESEARCHER BULLETIN OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (PEJOUHANDEH), 7(3 (29)), 217-222. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/528317/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADI F., JORJANI M., AMIR JAVANBAKHT A.M.. COMPARISON OF DV PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SUNSCREENS OF SPF=30 AND SPF=100. RESEARCHER BULLETIN OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (PEJOUHANDEH)[Internet]. 2002;7(3 (29)):217-222. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/528317/en

IEEE: Copy

F. AHMADI, M. JORJANI, and A.M. AMIR JAVANBAKHT, “COMPARISON OF DV PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SUNSCREENS OF SPF=30 AND SPF=100,” RESEARCHER BULLETIN OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (PEJOUHANDEH), vol. 7, no. 3 (29), pp. 217–222, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/528317/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops