THE USE OF PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANTS FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN CHILDREN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALLAHYARY E.; FARBOUD A.; GHAFARI S.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Armaghane Danesh Year:2004 | Volume:9 | Issue:33 Page(s): 8-16

Download Full-Text

View:

234

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE USE OF PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANTS FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN CHILDREN

Author(s)

ALLAHYARY E. | FARBOUD A. | GHAFARI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REMIFENTANIL

PROPOFOL

NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Common practice in induction of anesthesia for tracheal intubation is the administration of hypnotic drugs followed by a muscle relaxant. The use of muscle relaxants in short time operations is controversial due to their side effects and prolonged paralysis. Materials & Methods: We evaluated the nasotracheal intubating conditions in 76 healthy premedicated children after PROPOFOL 2.5 mg/kg combined with either a bolus of REMIFENTANIL 2µ/kg (study group) or suxamethonium 1.5 mg/kg (control group).Nasotracheal intubations were done by a blinded anesthetist and intubating conditions were graded using a four point scoring system based on mask ventilation feasibility, jaw relaxation, position of vocal cords and degree of coughing and limb movement. Also homodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored. Results: Intubating conditions were acceptable in 36/40 (90%) and 34/36 (94.4%) of REMIFENTANIL and suxamethonium group respectively. There were no significant differences in all scores between two groups except of coughing and limb movement that was lower in control compared to REMIFENTANIL group. Also subjects who received REMIFENTANIL have lower blood pressures and heart rates after tracheal intubation in compared to another group, but these hemodynamic changes were well tolerated by the patients. Only in two patients atropine was administered for treatment of bradycardia. Conclusion: REMIFENTANIL 2µ/kg following PROPOFOL 2.5 mg/kg provides acceptable nasotracheal intubating conditions in the most of the cases without muscle relaxants.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALLAHYARY, E., FARBOUD, A., & GHAFARI, S.. (2004). THE USE OF PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANTS FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN CHILDREN. ARMAGHAN DANESH, 9(33), 8-16. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/529011/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALLAHYARY E., FARBOUD A., GHAFARI S.. THE USE OF PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANTS FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN CHILDREN. ARMAGHAN DANESH[Internet]. 2004;9(33):8-16. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/529011/en

IEEE: Copy

E. ALLAHYARY, A. FARBOUD, and S. GHAFARI, “THE USE OF PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANTS FOR NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN CHILDREN,” ARMAGHAN DANESH, vol. 9, no. 33, pp. 8–16, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/529011/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops