COMPARISON OF SUCCESSFUL INTUBATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT BLADES OF LARYNGOSCOPE: SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHRIARI A.; KHOOSHIDEH M.; ENAYATI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS) Year:2007 | Volume:12 | Issue:1 Page(s): 41-44

Download Full-Text

View:

405

Download:

175

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SUCCESSFUL INTUBATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT BLADES OF LARYNGOSCOPE: SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE

Author(s)

SHAHRIARI A. | KHOOSHIDEH M. | ENAYATI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SINGLE-USE BLADE

REUSABLE BLADE

LARYNGOSCOPE

TRACHEAL INTUBATION

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many types of SINGLE-USE BLADEs are manufactured with different designs and materials. There have been several reports of difficulties in obtaining a view of the glottis with single-use LARYNGOSCOPEs. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the quickness and the success rate of endotracheal intubations with two different LARYNGOSCOPE blades: disposable LARYNGOSCOPE blades and reusable LARYNGOSCOPE blades. METHODS: The study included 200 patients aged 18 to 70 who were admitted to the operating room of the Ali-Ebne Abitaleb Hospital in Zahedan. The patients were randomly divided in two groups. Disposable LARYNGOSCOPE blades were used for the first group and reusable LARYNGOSCOPE blades were used for the second group. The endotracheal intubation duration and the failure rate of the intubation were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: No failures and prolongations of intubations were found in the reusable LARYNGOSCOPE blades group compared with 21% incidence of prolonged intubations and 14% incidence of failed intubations in the prolonged intubations group which led to change of the LARYNGOSCOPE by the anesthetists (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The single-use LARYNGOSCOPE blades appear to be efficient devices because they do not modify the ease of endotracheal intubation in most cases. Nonetheless, for difficult intubations it is advised to maintain conventional LARYNGOSCOPEs in reserve.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHRIARI, A., KHOOSHIDEH, M., & ENAYATI, H.. (2007). COMPARISON OF SUCCESSFUL INTUBATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT BLADES OF LARYNGOSCOPE: SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), 12(1), 41-44. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/533895/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHRIARI A., KHOOSHIDEH M., ENAYATI H.. COMPARISON OF SUCCESSFUL INTUBATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT BLADES OF LARYNGOSCOPE: SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS)[Internet]. 2007;12(1):41-44. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/533895/en

IEEE: Copy

A. SHAHRIARI, M. KHOOSHIDEH, and H. ENAYATI, “COMPARISON OF SUCCESSFUL INTUBATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT BLADES OF LARYNGOSCOPE: SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/533895/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops