COMPARING THE RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF RESIN BONDED RESTORATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAJOGHLI F.; NOSOUHIAN S.; SEYEDMOZAFARE M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

902

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF RESIN BONDED RESTORATIONS

Author(s)

BAJOGHLI F. | NOSOUHIAN S. | SEYEDMOZAFARE M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTIONQ3

DENTAL PROSTHESISQ3

DENTUREQ2

FIXEDQ3

RESIN-BONDEDQ2

RESIN CEMENTQ2

TOOTH PREPARATIONQ2

PROSTHODONTICQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: Prosthesis design has an important effect on its retention, especially in Resin Bonded Restorations (RBRs) in which preparation is conservative since there are different design possibilities to fabricate RBRs. The aim of this study was to compare the retention of RBRs with two different designs.Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, twenty-two RBRs were fabricated from twenty-two premolar and second molar teeth which had the same size and no carries. In the first group, conventional preparation which included lingual preparation, guiding planes, occlusal rests and two grooves in interproximal areas, was perfomed. In the second group, preparation included only class II inlay cavity preparation on the edentulous side. After frame work fabrication, the samples were cemented with RESIN CEMENT (Panavia F), and subjected to tensile force. The force required to separate each sample was recorded and the results in the two groups were compared by t test.Results: Average retention in the group with conventional design was 39.523±8.62 kgf and 25.715±4.10 kgf in the group with modified design. The difference was shown significant by the statistical t test (P<0.001).Conclusion: Results indicate that the design with conventional preparation had a higher retention than the modified design that has only Class II intercoronal retainers.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAJOGHLI, F., NOSOUHIAN, S., & SEYEDMOZAFARE, M.. (2011). COMPARING THE RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF RESIN BONDED RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 22(4 (77)), 233-239. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54710/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAJOGHLI F., NOSOUHIAN S., SEYEDMOZAFARE M.. COMPARING THE RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF RESIN BONDED RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2011;22(4 (77)):233-239. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54710/en

IEEE: Copy

F. BAJOGHLI, S. NOSOUHIAN, and M. SEYEDMOZAFARE, “COMPARING THE RETENTION OF TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF RESIN BONDED RESTORATIONS,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 22, no. 4 (77), pp. 233–239, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54710/en

Related Journal Papers