COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF AMALGAM, CORE MAX II AND LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE IN ROOT CANAL TREATED TEETH (IN - VITRO)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHAMVERDI Z.; KASRAEI SH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

803

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF AMALGAM, CORE MAX II AND LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE IN ROOT CANAL TREATED TEETH (IN - VITRO)

Author(s)

KHAMVERDI Z. | KASRAEI SH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MICROLEAKAGEQ3

AMALGAMQ3

LIGHT CURED COMPOSITEQ3

COREQ3

CORE MAX IIQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Marginal sealing of restorative materials is an important factor in long - term durability of restoration. The aim of this study was to compare the micro leakage among three materials including AMALGAM, CORE Max II and LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE applied on root canal treated teeth using dye penetration technique.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 45 intact upper first premolars were divided into three groups (n = 15). Following the preparation of a conservative access cavity and root canal treatment, the crowns of teeth were cut at 4 mm upper to pulp chamber floor. The teeth at each group were restored with AMALGAM, CORE Max II and LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE. Then, the samples were subjected to thermo cycling to evaluate MICROLEAKAGE using dye penetration technique. The teeth were sectioned and the rates of MICROLEAKAGE were measured under X7 stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann - Whitney U tests.Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the MICROLEAKAGE of CORE Max II and composite groups and also between CORE Max II and AMALGAM groups, however; significant difference was found between composite and AMALGAM groups.Conclusion: It seems that CORE Max II is not an appropriate CORE material.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHAMVERDI, Z., & KASRAEI, SH.. (2006). COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF AMALGAM, CORE MAX II AND LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE IN ROOT CANAL TREATED TEETH (IN - VITRO). JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 18(1 (58)), 43-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54840/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHAMVERDI Z., KASRAEI SH.. COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF AMALGAM, CORE MAX II AND LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE IN ROOT CANAL TREATED TEETH (IN - VITRO). JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2006;18(1 (58)):43-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54840/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. KHAMVERDI, and SH. KASRAEI, “COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF AMALGAM, CORE MAX II AND LIGHT CURED COMPOSITE IN ROOT CANAL TREATED TEETH (IN - VITRO),” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 18, no. 1 (58), pp. 43–48, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54840/en

Related Journal Papers